Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lowbridge

Do laws against harassment and assault not apply at Dartmouth?


19 posted on 05/31/2016 5:19:55 PM PDT by Buttons12 ( It Can't Happen Here -- Sinclair Lewis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Buttons12

There are no laws.

There is only power.


20 posted on 05/31/2016 5:20:36 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Nation States seem to be ending. The follow-on should not be Globalism, but Localism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Buttons12

As an alumnus (granted from almost 30 years ago....), I feel qualified to answer this. Let me preface my response by saying that I am a card-carrying Republican and an ardent supporter of the Second Amendment, and always have been. I chose where to pursue higher education based on academic excellence, not politics. I’m fairly sure I was the only non-liberal ever on campus. Being an absolute minority conservative on a liberal campus makes for a very interesting educational experience.

BLM is just about the most abhorrent group to walk the face of the earth, with the possible exception of Westboro Baptist Church. That said, whether we like it or not, Free Speech is a constitutional right. Trump rallies have repeatedly seen far more hatred and violence than this, and yet these are permitted expressions of the right to free speech. Ferguson? Same story...those arrested were arrested for physical violence and breaking the law, not verbal stupidity. Westboro needs no explanation.

Do I agree with ANY of the tactics groups like this take? No just no, but HELL no. Unfortunately, disagreeing with BLM’s message (which I do, completely) doesn’t mean they have no right to speak. Dartmouth is nothing more than geography...if not there, they’d trot on down the road to Lebanon College, or Colby-Sawyer College or Norwich University. Sadly, BLM and other hate groups have the same constitutional right to free speech as every other citizen. While I sometimes wish there could be limits placed on free speech and how opinions can be expressed, that would be a slippery slope to start down.

Back in the day, “free speech” had a very different meaning. Carrying signs and burning bras, etc.... Now, as is common with much of the “entitled” generation, they don’t know when to stop, or when too far is too far with this as a constitutional right.

Just my two cents.


46 posted on 05/31/2016 6:38:49 PM PDT by JustOneStarfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson