Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway

What ends it is when someone who has had their assets forfeited sues the pluperfect hell out of those who seized them unlawfully. Not just for the amount stolen, but with considerable punitive damages.


2 posted on 06/08/2016 11:05:48 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
What ends it is when someone who has had their assets forfeited sues the pluperfect hell out of those who seized them unlawfully.

Which, in this case, would likely cost them $10,000+ for the return of a $2500 car.

Sure, the law say they can't have their stuff seized until conviction, but right now, that car is evidence and will be impounded and held as such. Technically, the cops have not officially "seized" the car - it's impounded as evidence. The actual seizure will occur once the screwball mechanic gets convicted.

The cost of litigation to return one's property is the number one reason asset seizure laws continue to exist. That, and the fact that we are entirely unwilling to actually stand and fight - and die, if necessary - protecting our rights.

3 posted on 06/08/2016 11:15:30 AM PDT by dware (I don't care what bathroom they use, as long as it's in the nuthouse, where they belong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson