Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama an unindicted co-conspirator in Clinton email felonies?
American Thinker ^ | June 11, 2016 | Daniel John Sobieski

Posted on 06/11/2016 6:49:25 AM PDT by detective

President Obama has made it official, endorsing Hillary Clinton for president. If elected, she will serve her first term and his third, starting in January 2017 – that is, unless Hillary makes a different kind of history and president Obama is forced to pardon her after a possible and increasingly likely criminal referral by the FBI. There is another wrinkle. In a video of a Fox News interview, posted by Rick Wells on his website, ConstitutionRising.com, Fox News contributor Judge Andrew Napolitano tells host Steve Doocy that President Obama may be criminally liable as well:

Now that he's formally endorsed his corrupt former Secretary of State for Criminal-in-Chief, the concerns expressed in this video by Judge Andrew Napolitano become even more real. Napolitano is concerned about the pressure that the endorsement puts on both FBI Director Comey and Attorney General Loretta Lynch to do the "Obama shuffle" and fail to pursue the criminal Mrs. Clinton. He's also uneasy about the position the investigating agents will find themselves in. In that regard, Napolitano has concerns on two fronts, the investigations into espionage and public corruption by Mrs. Clinton.

Napolitano adds in closing, "The 'president's' conflicts are unbelievable. Some of the top secret information found on Mrs. Clinton's server was emailed to her by 'president' Obama. So he, himself, participated in taking State secrets and putting it in a non-secure venue. Might he have to be a witness in the case against her? And might that influence his decision about whether or not she can be indicted?"

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: clinton; crookedhillary; felons; obama
The question that no one in the media is asking is how many emails were actually deleted and how many of those deleted emails were sent to or sent from the White House.
1 posted on 06/11/2016 6:49:25 AM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: detective

Hillary delivered half of her e-mails, and in unsearchable paper form.

Then she said, “There’s a record, because you can search the e-mail records of anyone you think I might have written to in the government, at their end.” (Not an exact quote, but the meaning is there.)

Well, a full search is a hopeless task, but a limited search of selected officials would be easy... if it wasn’t stymied by some Presidential or Executive confidentiality law or custom.


2 posted on 06/11/2016 6:58:33 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

Very similar to Watergate in the criminal problem areas. They became moot when Nixon was forced to resign (for some two bit coverup compared to this capital felony conspiracy). He was forced to resign because the house and senate had their hatchets out for him by way of impeachment which this POS has been sheltered from.

So, where does that leave us? Same place most banana republic dictator led countries operating beyond the rule of law end up. Just like with those banana republics, the majority of the public does not care enough to say: this will not stand and take out the current one and replace it (my signature tag explains that).

I heard a description about our workforce yesterday which is partly the problem for where we are too. We have close to 100 million now whose sole employment compensation comes from opening their mail box.


3 posted on 06/11/2016 7:00:18 AM PDT by Mouton (The insurrection laws maintain the status quo now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Obama's endorsing Hillary presents unbelievable conflicts of interst. Some of the top secret information found on Mrs. Clinton's server was emailed to her by 'president' Obama. So he, himself, participated in taking State secrets and putting it in a non-secure venue. Might he have to be a witness in the case against her? And might that influence his decision about whether or not she can be indicted?"

The Clintons' truckload of crime is about to be dumped onto the Obama legacy.

ACADEMY-AWARD WORTHY---Obama puts on a convincing act.
He "knows nothing." Obama didn't even know about this (snix).

PIC Circa 2010--Ex-Pres Clinton in Moscow having a laugh w/ Putin
as strategic US uranium deposits were sold off to Russia for Big Bucks
facilitated by Secy Clinton, as Bill globe-trotted to set up the deal.

"Hahahaha. US ntl security? Hahahaha. You gotta be kidding, Vlad."

====================================================

With all the top-level intel available to him, can Americans actually believe:

<><>Obama was oblivious to the Clintons jerking around US foreign policy?

<><> Obama knew nothing of Hillary and Sid Blumenthal's emails WRT Iran (the man Obama banned from US govt employment)?

<><> Obama knew nothing about the Clinton Foundation/slush fund buck-raking activities?

<><> Obama never noticed Bill Clinton trotting around the globe?

<><> Obama never noticed the Clinton "charity" used to worm his way into the confidences of foreign leaders.... but only those leaders w/ untapped reserves of gold, uranium, oil, and other valuable commodities?

<><> Obama never knew Hillary's brother got a gold-mining permit in Haiti?

Hand-picked by Obama to run State, Hillary ran it like a shadow govt.... w/ her husband taking notes WRT buck-raking opportunities available from Hillary's actions OR inaction.

Secy Hillary never e-v-e-r uttered a discouraging word e-v-e-r......as the Clinton Foundation sucked up hundred of millions of foreign dollars from shady characters.

OF COURSE, the Clintons/ activities NEVER interfered w/ Obama/s OWN foreign policy initiatives (cue laugh machine).

4 posted on 06/11/2016 7:07:38 AM PDT by Liz (SAFE PLACE? A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing penetrates it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

Not a well written article. Should have just said that since Obama sent emails to a non Dot Gov server he too broke the secrets law.

Obama must also know as the guy in charge that only gov servers are secure. So Obama knew Hillary had her own server for official business, and still he sent her emails.

Sure I know he is going to say he is an idiot, but the law doesn’t care if your stupid, tell that to an IRS agent and they will smile.


5 posted on 06/11/2016 7:11:10 AM PDT by Zenjitsuman (Y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All
The Clintons selling access to State Dept decisions and passing on classified information to interested parties for a foundation donation.......NEVER, EVER interfered w/ Obama/s OWN foreign policy initiatives (cue laugh machine).

Does some enterprising reporter want to match-up Obama's foreign policy decisions w/ Hillary's State Dept activities?

And the timing of donations to the Clinton Foundation?

6 posted on 06/11/2016 7:11:33 AM PDT by Liz (SAFE PLACE? A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing penetrates it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: detective
. He's also uneasy about the position the investigating agents will find themselves in.

I agree with that. Unfortunately, I believe no one will EVER be held accountable. If the Hildebeast gets elected, and I hope that never happens, but if she does, I think there may some FBI agents that will be found taking dirt naps in Fort Marcy Park.

7 posted on 06/11/2016 7:16:03 AM PDT by Mark17 (I traded my shackles for a glorious song. I'm free, praise the Lord, free at last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

A provision in the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) is intended to prevent United States citizens and companies being used as instrumentalities of a foreign government’s foreign policy.

This clearly describe Hillary’s activities at the State Dept.


As a tax-paid govt employee, Hillary clearly used her tax-paid office for purely political reasons.......involving the interests of foreign countries.......particularly donors to the Clinton Foundation.

The Export Administration Regulations (EAR) apply to all “U.S. persons” (defined to include individuals and companies located in the United States and their foreign affiliates).

The provisions are intended to prevent United States citizens and companies being used as instrumentalities of a foreign government’s foreign policy.

These persons are subject to the law when their activities relate to the sale, purchase, or transfer of goods or services (including the sale of information) within the United States or between the United States and a foreign country.

This covers exports and imports, financing, forwarding and shipping, and certain other transactions that may take place wholly offshore.....AND/OR ACROSS THE BORDER.


MEMO TO DONALD: Check it out. Hillary’s activites at the State Dept centered on selling access....using her tax-paid office to advance the foreign policy of foreign govts....for a fee.

The Export Administration Regulations (EAR)is intended to prevent United States citizens and companies being used as instrumentalities of a foreign government’s foreign policy..


8 posted on 06/11/2016 7:16:26 AM PDT by Liz (SAFE PLACE? A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing penetrates it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All

A provision in the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) is intended to prevent United States citizens and companies being used as instrumentalities of a foreign government’s foreign policy.

This clearly describe Hillary’s activities at the State Dept.


As a tax-paid govt employee, Hillary clearly used her tax-paid office for purely political reasons.......involving the interests of foreign countries.......particularly donors to the Clinton Foundation.

The Export Administration Regulations (EAR) apply to all “U.S. persons” (defined to include individuals and companies located in the United States and their foreign affiliates).

The provisions are intended to prevent United States citizens and companies being used as instrumentalities of a foreign government’s foreign policy.

These persons are subject to the law when their activities relate to the sale, purchase, or transfer of goods or services (including the sale of information) within the United States or between the United States and a foreign country.

This covers exports and imports, financing, forwarding and shipping, and certain other transactions that may take place wholly offshore.....AND/OR ACROSS THE BORDER.


MEMO TO DONALD: Check it out. Hillary’s activites at the State Dept centered on selling access....using her tax-paid office to advance the foreign policy of foreign govts....for a fee.

The Export Administration Regulations (EAR)is intended to prevent United States citizens and companies being used as instrumentalities of a foreign government’s foreign policy..


9 posted on 06/11/2016 7:16:27 AM PDT by Liz (SAFE PLACE? A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing penetrates it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: detective

If elected, she will serve her first term and his third ...
++++
I keep reading this but I’ve never figured out what would constrain Hillary to maintain policies that would benefit The Obama Legacy in any way. Hillary’s Agenda would be focusing on the transition from $Millons to $Billions.


10 posted on 06/11/2016 7:16:39 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (Still a Cruz Fan but voting for Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zenjitsuman

All of it happened on Hussein’s watch...he is culpable.


11 posted on 06/11/2016 7:19:10 AM PDT by Hotlanta Mike ('You can avoid reality, but you can't avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: detective

You bet Obama is all over this.


12 posted on 06/11/2016 7:21:12 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper (And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

The answer is : emails to the bamster in the hut were selectively deleted from her server.

The bamster knew what she was up to & read those emails.

They are both in collusion- if DOJ goes after Hitlery then evidence of the bam’ comes into play.

who is more guilty? the bam’ or hitlery?

It’s going to be long hot summer .


13 posted on 06/11/2016 7:26:11 AM PDT by thesligoduffyflynns (Shrimp Egg Foo Young- A tasty dish! gravy on the side please)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

Hillary could give a rat’s behind about Obama’s legacy. It’s all about her......always has been.


14 posted on 06/11/2016 7:26:30 AM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: detective

Another question that no one in the media is asking (of Hillary) is: “Would you permit your cabinet secretaries to have their own private email servers and use them for official communications?”

The reasons they won’t ask her is that if she says ‘yes’ (1) she clearly has no regard whatsoever for national security and (2) if she says ‘no’ she indicts herself.


15 posted on 06/11/2016 7:32:43 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

“”Some of the top secret information found on Mrs. Clinton’s server was emailed to her by ‘president’ Obama.””

You can bet obozo never sent her any emails. He couldn’t be bothered with any official business. That’s why Valarie Jarrett is in his hip pocket! As to what he does to earn his paycheck and perks besides appearing in front of a microphone and lying to us is anyone’s guess. I wonder what condition the country would be in if he WAS the one making the decisions. He’s a figurehead and nothing more!


16 posted on 06/11/2016 7:39:46 AM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

How far we’ve come or how low we’ve fallen since Sherman Adams got in trouble when he was a plain old Chief of Staff to Eisenhower. Today - the sky is the limit! We can have a Secretary of State (albeit former) who lies as effortlessly as breathing and all we get is TALK, more lies and coverup!

http://downfalldictionary.blogspot.com/2009/09/sherman-adams-coating-of-scandal.html

“”The aspect of the scandal gaining the most attention, however, was the gifts that Goldfine sent to Adams. The most prominent was a vicuña coat, though Adams also accepted an expensive Oriental rug and a few mats. The subcommittee also determined that Goldfine paid about $3,000 worth of hotel expenses for Adams’ trips to New England. The investigation looked into whether Adams had sought to influence $40,382 in penalty refund payments to the defunct Raylaine Worsteds Corporation, but that charge was dropped for lack of evidence.””


17 posted on 06/11/2016 7:53:54 AM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mark17

I might agree on the FBI people being found in Ft Marcy Park, except for one thing.

The moment the criminal charge is sent down, and no indictment or no arrest is forthcoming from the DOJ, there have been rumors of rumblings in the FBI office; wholesale walkouts of employees, plus volumes of info leaked to media who will make it public, etc., etc., etc.

Do I believe all of that will happen .. Hmmmmm ..?? Maybe .. only because Comey has his reputation to consider; if he lets it slide, he might as well retire.


18 posted on 06/11/2016 9:14:18 AM PDT by CyberAnt ("Peace Through Strength")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: detective
Obama an unindicted co-conspirator in Clinton email felonies?

Precisely why Madam Benghazi will not be indicted. To avoid embarrassment and a political showdown, I suspect the FBI investigation will drag out till next year, or at least after the election.

19 posted on 06/11/2016 9:35:06 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
The moment the criminal charge is sent down, and no indictment or no arrest is forthcoming from the DOJ, there have been rumors of rumblings in the FBI office; wholesale walkouts of employees, plus volumes of info leaked to media who will make it public, etc., etc

Yes, but as we have seen, the people don't care about integrity. Billy Jeff and the Obungler have 0 integrity, and both were elected twice. I have no doubt tons of information would be leaked and published, but it doesn't matter to these swine.
On the other hand, the Hildabeast would probably just pardon herself. It's never been done, but who would stop her?
Do I believe these investigating agents could be in physical danger? Absolutely, totally, completely, 100% YES, YES YES.

20 posted on 06/11/2016 6:54:34 PM PDT by Mark17 (I traded my shackles for a glorious song. I'm free, praise the Lord, free at last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson