Skip to comments.
TWA 800: Jim Kallstrom’s Road to Redemption
American Thinker ^
| June 20, 2016
| Jack Cashill
Posted on 06/20/2016 11:33:04 AM PDT by Kaslin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 301-305 next last
To: Kaslin
Let's not forget Limbaugh's vigorous defense of Kallstrom in the face of his obvious TWA800 lies. I point this out as 24-7 subscriber, former (due to now mostly working at client sites) frequent caller who was almost always put on the air, and many years fan of Rush.
Rush says Kallstrom is a trusted friend. I sort of feel Rush is a trusted friend, but when he's obviously wrong, I will call him out as I do here.
ML/NJ (= "Mike from North Caldwell")
81
posted on
06/20/2016 2:57:59 PM PDT
by
ml/nj
To: Kaslin
Deeply dishonorable man
82
posted on
06/20/2016 3:09:22 PM PDT
by
gaijin
To: gaijin
83
posted on
06/20/2016 3:18:53 PM PDT
by
gaijin
To: Talisker
But I don't. And you can't. But that doesn't surprise me given your past posts on this topic.
To: Talisker
But you made a good point - the missile wasn't a heat seeker, so that gives info on what it could be - and what was needed to launch it. Thanks. Which is what?
To: Lower Deck
Manpads.
86
posted on
06/20/2016 3:25:31 PM PDT
by
Sirius Lee
(If Trump loses, America dies)
To: Talisker
Obviously because it was radar guided to the center of mass (thus enabling the center fuel tank cover story, where that wouldn’t be possible with a heat seeking engine hit). But you made a good point - the missile wasn’t a heat seeker, so that gives info on what it could be - and what was needed to launch it. Thanks.
...
According to the NTSB, the very same air conditioning packs below the center tank, which helped make the vapor in the tank flammable by heating, would have been a viable target for a heat seeking missile.
87
posted on
06/20/2016 3:28:07 PM PDT
by
Moonman62
(Make America Great Again!)
To: Moonman62
According to the NTSB, the very same air conditioning packs below the center tank, which helped make the vapor in the tank flammable by heating, would have been a viable target for a heat seeking missile. It seems the engines would have been way hotter, though.
88
posted on
06/20/2016 3:30:14 PM PDT
by
Talisker
(One who commands, must obey.)
To: Talisker
In my non-expert opinion I think an engine would be a more likely target, but the NTSB specifically said the air conditioning packs would have been a sufficient target, too.
89
posted on
06/20/2016 3:52:06 PM PDT
by
Moonman62
(Make America Great Again!)
To: DesertRhino
90
posted on
06/20/2016 4:51:41 PM PDT
by
batterycommander
(Surrounded? Relax and call for artillery.)
To: orchestra
My ears perked up especially when he mentioned there being a fifth column at work in government. ...and if pressed, I'd bet money he'd claim that they are white supremacists and patriot militias.
IMO, Kallstrom is a POS of the highest order.
91
posted on
06/20/2016 4:54:31 PM PDT
by
Roccus
(POLITICIAN....JOURNALIST............... four letter words spelled with ten letters.)
To: WENDLE
The missile was seen by over 100 witnesses rising off the surface of the Bay probably launched rom a speed boat. You really have no idea what you are talking about...but then again, that has never stopped you before.
92
posted on
06/20/2016 4:59:16 PM PDT
by
Roccus
(POLITICIAN....JOURNALIST............... four letter words spelled with ten letters.)
To: batterycommander
The problem is that the website you link to provides no evidence whatsoever that such a weapon is or was under development. It gives some reasons, easily discounted, on why they think such a weapon would be a good idea but can't point to anything that supports its existence.
To: DesertRhino
Did you see the video the night of the shoot down? If you didn’t you are blowing smoke. I watched the video before it went down the rabbit hole, no doubt in my mind it was a missile.
94
posted on
06/20/2016 5:10:32 PM PDT
by
VTenigma
(The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
To: Lower Deck
The Russians thought it was a good idea and have had it since 1982. That’s why I think the Russians did it.
95
posted on
06/20/2016 5:56:11 PM PDT
by
batterycommander
(Surrounded? Relax and call for artillery.)
To: VTenigma
Did you see the video the night of the shoot down? If you are talking about the low-light video shot inside the military aircraft cockpit, I saw it also....and yes, it has gone down the rabbit hole!
96
posted on
06/20/2016 6:44:45 PM PDT
by
Roccus
(POLITICIAN....JOURNALIST............... four letter words spelled with ten letters.)
To: Roccus
97
posted on
06/20/2016 6:56:22 PM PDT
by
VTenigma
(The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
To: VTenigma
I wish I could remember exactly what was said in that video. I only saw it once. But I do remember that they had an “Oh shit!” moment, though prolly not using those exact words.
It must have been on either CBS, NBC or ABC because at that time I did not have cable, so it was an over the air broadcast.
98
posted on
06/20/2016 7:13:04 PM PDT
by
Roccus
(POLITICIAN....JOURNALIST............... four letter words spelled with ten letters.)
To: VTenigma
On several TWA 800 threads I’ve asked if anyone else saw that video. YOU are the ONLY one to have answered in the affirmative.
99
posted on
06/20/2016 7:15:39 PM PDT
by
Roccus
(POLITICIAN....JOURNALIST............... four letter words spelled with ten letters.)
To: Talisker; OA5599; Lower Deck
100
posted on
06/20/2016 7:22:34 PM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
(Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 301-305 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson