I can work with either definition of "constitutional," and prefer to not argue over what the label means. My point is that the victor claims his actions are constitutional. As you point out, the "rule of man" that the PTB impose these days is labeled "constitutional" by the courts and the government. The official word (for what that is worth) is that homosexual marriage, affirmative action, deprivation of rights by entry on a secret list, unfettered snooping, etc. are "constitutional."
SCOTUS has Alice in Wonderland powers, and it is eager to use them.
I don't personally grant them legitimacy, but if push comes to shove, they'd kill me and laugh about it.
Again, don’t acquiesce to the Leftist lies. Just because the Left (and those gullible enough to believe the Left, “constitutional” doesn’t make it so.
I’ve given a reasonable definition of what is actually “constitutional” supported by renowned constitutional scholars such as Judge Bork. Left says its constitutional because SCOTUS says it is. Don’t let the Lying Left make up their own definitions for you.
And if it comes to Left coming to kill you, be ready to shoot first.