Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Firearms Policy Organization's Reply to Gov. Brown, Gun Laws
Firearms Policy Organizatiom | 7/1/2016 | NA

Posted on 07/01/2016 10:46:41 PM PDT by dvan

This morning, four-term Governor Jerry Brown conspired with other members of the State’s corrupt one-party majority to make it easier for criminals and terrorists to kill innocent people, said civil rights advocacy organization Firearms Policy Coalition.

Brown signed six and vetoed four of the eleven anti-gun, pro-terror bills that were passed by the Legislature yesterday.

The “Gunpocalypse” legislation signed by the Governor today will create new criminal liabilities affecting millions of law-abiding people, cost the state tens of millions of dollars in new fees and fines, and eviscerate fundamental, individual rights.

“These are constitutionally-illegitimate laws passed by a patently illegitimate government that had the audacity to attack and criminalize millions of its own people in Stalin-esque fashion,” said Firearms Policy Coalition President Brandon Combs.

“We expect mass non-compliance with these laws and encourage good, peaceful Californians to carefully consider the risks of voluntarily identifying their firearms, magazines, and ammunition to law enforcement officials, especially the California Department of Justice.”

The Legislature suspended nearly every procedural rule to rush these anti-gun, ISIS-enabling bills through to Brown before he left for Europe, a place that may have served as the model for his unconstitutional firearm policies. Now that the first phase of their year-long campaign to support violent criminals and terrorists is complete, the members of the Legislature who passed the bills have left Sacramento for a month-long, taxpayer-funded vacation.

“The Legislature ignored every rule in the book to fast-track their civilian disarmament agenda and herd the people into a state-wide gun-free-zone,” said Craig DeLuz, the director of public and legislative affairs for Firearms Policy Coalition.

Continued DeLuz, “There are still a dozen anti-gun bills pending in the Legislature, and while Governor Brown’s actions today were disturbing, Firearms Policy Coalition and our members will continue to fight to defend and restore the Second Amendment in California.”

With Senate Bill 1446—a statewide, confiscatory ban on lawfully-possessed “large-capacity” magazines—law enforcement interests once again cut shady deals to exempt their retired members from the long reach of the new gun control laws.

Earlier this year, Firearms Policy Coalition, two other civil rights groups, and a number of individuals filed a federal civil rights lawsuit–captioned Garcia v. Attorney General Kamala Harris–that challenges California’s gun law exemptions for retired law enforcement officers on Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection grounds.

“Jerry Brown and the California Legislature have openly declared war on gun owners and the Bill of Rights,” continued Combs. “By signing the bills that he did, Governor Brown showed us that he has no respect for the rule of law, reason, or law-abiding people. I submit that he and his ilk deserve the same contempt in return.”

“The government would be wise to remember that there are more California residents with guns than there are government officials to take them away. To coin a phrase, ‘come and take it’,” Combs concluded. The Governor signed the following bills today:

AB 1135 (Levine): Bans common and constitutionally-protected firearms that have magazine locking devices. AB 1511 (Santiago): Criminalizes loaning of firearms between personally known, law-abiding adults, including family members, sportspersons, and competitors. AB 1695 (Bonta): Makes a non-violent misdemeanor a prohibiting offense. SB 880 (Hall): Bans common and constitutionally-protected firearms that have magazine locking devices. SB 1235 (de Leon): New restrictions on ammunition purchases; creates a DOJ database of ammunition owners. SB 1446 (Hancock): Statewide confiscatory ban on all lawfully-possessed standard-capacity ammunition feeding devices that hold more than 10 round; exemption for retired police

The Governor vetoed the following bills today:

AB 1673 (Gipson): Would have redefined “firearms” to include objects that are not firearms AB 1674 (Santiago): Would have banned buying more than one firearm of any type within a 30-day period AB 2607 (Ting): Would have dramatically expanded the reach of secret “Gun Violence Restraining Orders” SB 894 (Jackson): Would have re-victimized victims of theft by criminalizing the failure to report lost and stolen firearms

AB 857 (Cooper), which would require that serial numbers be placed on un-serialized firearms manufactured going back 50 years and on all new home-built firearms, is still pending.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: banglist; california
Digusting!
1 posted on 07/01/2016 10:46:41 PM PDT by dvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dvan

While they cower behind their ARMED body guards!!!


2 posted on 07/01/2016 10:52:24 PM PDT by tubebender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvan

Coward & a pervert. Way to go JB


3 posted on 07/01/2016 10:52:33 PM PDT by George Washington Axe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvan

Is every officer in the state subject to the same rules, including a background check every time they pull ammo?

No?

Why not?

Seems like the law is creating two classes of citizens, which, last I checked, was especially problematic when dealing with a constitutional right.

If these same types of rules were applied to say an abortion or to free speech, the courts would be begging people to bring lawsuits forward so they could issue the restraining order.

I’d imagine that any filing against things like a ten round magazine limit would have to note that those who are protecting the court have more than ten rounds - does the court enjoy more significant protection than a citizen has in defending their own home or business?


4 posted on 07/01/2016 11:01:32 PM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvan

No link? I’d like to share this but no link provided.


5 posted on 07/02/2016 12:17:01 AM PDT by Boomer (liberalism is a mental disease with no cure but a frontal lobotomy will make them less of a jerk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvan

Asked we only have 90 days to gather petition signatures to have the laws reversed in a ballot.


6 posted on 07/02/2016 1:48:52 AM PDT by Excellence (Marine mom since April 11, 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tubebender
While they cower behind their ARMED body guards!!!

Who would still be armed even if they managed to disarm all the citizens....

7 posted on 07/02/2016 4:10:21 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dvan

What did the Republicans do? Can they stop Moonbeam? /s


8 posted on 07/02/2016 4:15:28 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Moderate Muslims are the fans cheering for blood during a hockey game)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvan

The same people who can’t keep criminals out of office think they can keep guns out of the hands of the innocent. Libtards.


9 posted on 07/02/2016 4:24:57 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer
https://www.firearmspolicy.org/press-releases/breaking-california-governor-jerry-brown-guns-down-the-constitution/
10 posted on 07/02/2016 4:43:48 AM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dvan

The Head of the Snake

Now, I am not an artist, so I cannot draw you a picture, but perhaps I can explain it well enough to give you a picture in your mind.

Let me, as best I can, tell you why there has got to be a third Revolution, a Second Civil War, and why it may come within the next year or so and let me further add who it will be that does the fighting.

Picture if you will a beautiful summer day, a day with no clouds but a gentle breeze, a day when it is 90 in the sun, but the humidity is low, so it is not unduly uncomfortable.

You are sitting under a tree on your favorite lawn chair, playing on a blanket on the lawn in front of you is a perfect little blonde headed, blue eyed, 9 month old; you newest grandson.

Out of the corner of your eye you see a huge python slithering out of the bushes surrounding your property, as it comes closer you realize it is over 200 feet long and it is slithering right towards your grandson. You sit mesmerized, you cannot believe the size of that snake, a 200 feet python, a snake with a mouth big enough to swallow your grandson in one gulp. A snake your grandson sees, but due to his age, has no fear of, but instead starts crawling towards.

Now the snake is 3 feet from your grandson, it’s head is raised, it’s mouth is open, your grandson is laughing, thinking the snake is funny and means him no harm.

What are you going to do? 97% of you are going to go yell at the tail or try to compromise with the snake, maybe agree to it only eating a leg and an arm. But, 3% of us are going to go cut off the head of that snake, and flat out kill it, by cutting off it’s head.

In the above illustration, you are you, your grandson is your grandchildren, beautiful yard is the USA, the 200 foot python is the US G0vt.

In Maine there are 1,230,000 legal residents. 3% is 36,900 men, women, boys and girls, more than enough to cut of the head of not just a 200 foot snake but a 2,000 foot snake.

I know that I am no smarter than our members of Congress, I know I am no smarter than Barak Hussien Obama, I know that Gov. Paul LePage is every bit as smart, if not smarter than me, as are the majority of Maine’s Legislature, Sheriffs, Police, Courts and Media, it is they who are so much smarter than the rest of us, those who know what is best for us, those who would devour our grandchildren, they, we must guard against.

Let me quote Bob Ownes.

“What you’ll see in the rebellion Written By: Bob Owens - Dec• 28•2012
Let me explain, gun grabbers, how your confiscatory fantasy plays out. Let us imagine for a moment that a sweeping gun control bill similar to the one currently suggested is passed by the House and Senate, and signed into law by a contemptuous President.

Perhaps 50-100 million firearms currently owned by law-abiding citizens will become contraband with the stroke of a pen. Citizens will either register their firearms, or turn them in to agents of the federal government, or risk becoming criminals themselves. Faced with this choice, millions will indeed register their arms. Perhaps as many will claim they’ve sold their arms, or had them stolen. Suppose that as many as 200-250 million weapons of other types will go unregistered.

Tens of millions of Americans will refuse to comply with an order that is clearly a violation of the explicit intent of the Second Amendment. Among the most ardent opposing these measures will be military veterans, active duty servicemen, and local law enforcement officers. Many of these individuals will refuse to carry out what they view as Constitutionally illegal orders. Perhaps 40-50 million citizens will view such a law as treason. Perhaps ten percent of those, 4-5 million, would support a rebellion in some way, and maybe 40,000-100,000 Americans will form small independently-functioning active resistance cells, or become lone-wolves.

They will be leaderless, stateless, difficult to track, and considering the number of military veterans that would likely be among their number, extremely skilled at sabotage, assassination, and ambush.

After a number of carefully-planned, highly-publicized, and successful raids by the government, one or more will invariably end “badly.” Whether innocents are gunned down, a city block is burned to ash, or especially fierce resistance leads to a disastrously failed raid doesn’t particularly matter. What matters is that when illusion of the government’s invincibility and infallibility is broken, the hunters will become the hunted.

Unnamed citizens and federal agents will be the first to die, and they will die by the dozens and maybe hundreds, but famous politicians will soon join them in a spate of revenge killings, many of which will go unsolved.

Ironically, while the gun grab was intended to keep citizens from preserving their liberties with medium-powered weapons, it completely ignored the longer-ranged rifles perfect for shooting at ranges far beyond what a security detail can protect, and suppressed .22LR weapons proven deadly in urban sniping in Europe and Asia.

While the Secret Service will be able to protect the President in the White House, he will not dare leave his gilded cage except in carefully controlled circumstances. Even then he will be forced to move like a criminal. He will never be seen outdoors in public again. Not in this country.

The 535 members of the House and Senate in both parties that allowed such a law to pass would largely be on their own; the Secret Service is too small to protect all of them and their families, the Capitol Police too unskilled, and competent private security not particularly interested in working against their own best interests at any price. The elites will be steadily whittled down, and if they can not be reached directly, the targets will become their staffers, spouses, children, and grandchildren. Grandstanding media figures loyal to the regime would die in droves, executed as enemies of the Republic.

You can expect congressional staffs to disintegrate with just a few shootings, and expect elected officials themselves to resign well before a quarter of their number are eliminated, leaving us with a boxed-in executive, his cabinet loyalists trapped in the same win, die, or flee the country circumstance, military regime loyalists, and whatever State Governors who desire to risk their necks as well.

Here, the President will doubtlessly order the activation of National Guard units and the regular military to impose martial law, setting the largest and most powerful military in the world against its own people. Unfortunately, the tighter the President clinches his tyrannical fist, the more rebels he makes.

Military commands and federal agencies will be whittled down as servicemen and agents will desert or defect. Some may leave as individuals, others may join the Rebellion in squad and larger-sized units with all their weapons, tactics, skills, and insider intelligence. The regime will be unable to trust its own people, and because they cannot trust them, they will lose more in a vicious cycle of collapse.

Some of these defectors will be true “operators,” with the skills and background to turn ragtag militia cells into the kind of forces that decimate loyalist troops, allowing them no rest and no respite, striking them when they are away from their most potent weapons. Military vehicles are formidable, but they are thirsty beasts, in terms of fuel, ammo, time, and maintenance. Tanks and bombers are formidable only when they have gas, guns, and can be maintained. In a war without a front, logistics are incredibly easy to destroy, and mechanics and supply clerks are not particularly adept at defending themselves.

Eventually, the government will turn upon itself. The President will be captured or perhaps killed by his own protectors. A dictatorship will form in the vacuum.

If we’re lucky, the United States of America, or whatever amalgam results, will again try to rebuild. If we’re very lucky, the victors will reinstate the Constitution as the law of the land. Just as likely though, we’ll face fractious civil wars fought over issues we’ve not begun to fathom, and a much diminished state or states will result, perhaps guided by foreign interests.

It will not be pretty. There will be no “winners,” and perhaps hundreds of thousands to millions of dead.

Yet, this is the future we face if the power-mad among us are not soundly defeated at the ballot box before they affect more “change” than we, the People, are willing to surrender to would-be tyrants.”


11 posted on 07/02/2016 5:25:13 AM PDT by The_Republic_Of_Maine (politicians beware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republic_Of_Maine

Chilling scenario, yet one I have thought about many times. I suspect many of us have had the same thoughts. Only the number of people who “resist” is subject to debate. I say 90 million gun owners, after all the BS from the government I figure 15%-20% refuse to comply and actively fight back; that is 15-18 million people. What government can stand up to that many people? Many as you stated have military training, some at true “operator” levels. And I suspect there are many caches of “equipment” hidden throughout this country.
The rest of what you suggest might happen will be needed. And in the end, we will have to live with what we have done, but I think I can do that. I just don’t want my daughter to have to face those choices.


12 posted on 07/02/2016 8:02:42 AM PDT by rustyboots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dvan

WHITE PERSON ALERT! Get out of Kalifornia NOW! Think of this as your “trigger warning”. Those nice off white people of color are coming for you. They will have your “white privilege” weather you believe it exists or not. When they show up at your doorstep demanding “social justice” and “economic equality” it will already be too late to run.


13 posted on 07/02/2016 3:39:35 PM PDT by Desron13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rustyboots

We feel the number of fighters will increase as the fight goes on and the number of police will decrease due to wives and families demanding they not go.

Half the nation thinks of blue helmets ass being targets so they are not a problem.

Donald Trump is our last resort.


14 posted on 07/02/2016 5:40:37 PM PDT by The_Republic_Of_Maine (politicians beware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson