Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mariner

I don’t get it....does not the secret, private server...constitute intent?


10 posted on 07/05/2016 10:27:40 AM PDT by roses of sharon ("Truly I tell you, today you will be with me in paradise." Luke 23:43)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: roses of sharon

Under the federal statutes that outline penalties for mishandling classified, intent is literally irrelevant. Either you followed the rules for creating, transmitting, storing and safeguarding classified material, or you didn’t. Clearly, Mrs. Clinton violated all of those requirements, on a daily basis. Yet, no “reasonable” prosecutor would bring charges.

I’ve said it before and I’ll repeat it again: the seminal scandal of the Clinton era was the unauthorized access of FBI background files. Not only did it yield dirt on almost a thousand prominent Republicans, it also opened up new avenues of digging on many, many more. Truth be told, the amount of information gathered over the past 25 years is staggering. Ever wonder why so many Republicans cave so quickly? In many cases, it goes back to the mother lode of op-research, which began with the background files.

The real question: what do the Clintons have on Mr. Comey? We know that John Roberts is supposedly vulnerable due to an overseas adoption that may have been illegal. The dirt on the FBI Director is probably far worse.


150 posted on 07/05/2016 12:51:49 PM PDT by ExNewsExSpook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson