Posted on 07/06/2016 9:53:43 AM PDT by McGruff
The past few weeks have brought a myriad of revelations about the private server Hillary Clinton used while she was secretary of state. First, there was the State Department inspector general’s devastating critique of the former secretary’s email practices. Then came sworn testimony of two key Clinton aides about how the server was set up and how the system worked (or didn’t). Just this weekend, Clinton met with the FBI to discuss her email arrangements. And on Tuesday, FBI Director James Comey announced that the agency would not recommend criminal charges over the handling of these emails, while at the same time offering a brutal assessment of how poorly Team Clinton handled classified information.
But, when it comes to Clinton’s correspondence, the most basic and troubling questions still remain unanswered: Why are there gaps in Clinton’s email history? Did she or her team delete emails that she should have made public?
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
Watch the media come out with different things now, they know ‘herself’ is done with, so why protect her anymore...
They know that idiotic N.C. yesterday with Barky was just for show...how disgraceful to have two traitors standing there like they represent America...
GO.TRUMP.GO!!! ALL THE WAY TO THE OVAL OFFICE!!!
some of the 30,000+ missing emails probably fill those gaps. My feeling is that 30,000+ missing emails far exceed the missing 18 seconds that caused Nixon so much trouble.
There's an 18 minute gap in this e-mail chain! What did the Secretary know, and when did she know it?
the infowarrior
Gaps can be covered....with a cloth.
The 4 letter word “GAPS” was instrumental in bringing down a REPUBLICAN president, the conflagration fueled by a determined MEDIA. They gleefully poured the gasoline on the fire, and proudly took credit for the turmoil.
Today, the media seems to define the word “GAP” as merely the space between someone’s two front teeth.
How tragic it is when the phrase “Free Press” becomes a threat to the nation’s very existence.
[ Did she or her team delete emails that she should have made public? ]
But, but, but, how could that be? She was as truthful about that as the Benghazi coverup to steal the 2012 election.
Not Hillary, no way. /Liberal who believes ABC/CBS/NBC/CNN/Yahoo.
Well put. "Free Press" has become a front to destroy the foundations of Christianity and natural law in the nation and promote every kind of insidious process to bring the nation state down.
Why was information deemed personal and private by a sitting Secretary of State allowed to be exempted from scrutiny? EVERY correspondence by those in high office doing official business are supposed to be government owned. That is why you keep personal emails in your personal server, computer, or with Comcast, and your business at a .gov address. To keep things separated for just this type of problem. Hillary CLEARLY set up a system where she could mingle both worlds, and be able to delete anything she wanted and claim it was personal, knowing full well that she was above the law.
Do these GAPS correspond with her Cerebral episode and when she was in the Hospital ?
Even if she deleted her copies how about the copy that the sender or receiver has?
It seems it would be easy to bust her on this by producing a work related email between Cheryl Mills and Hillary that Hillary didn't produce.
Does a bear take an Obama in the woods?
Is Bill Clinton a diseased whoremonger?
Is Hillary Clinton a more practiced liar than either Barack Obama or Bill Clinton?
Anyone remember Nixon’s 18 minute tape gap and how the press went apeshite about that? Well what we have here are tens of thousands of minutes worth of email gaps, but not many seemed too concerned about it. After all, it’s a Democrat this time rather than a Republican.
“Personal” emails include those containing information on personal corruption and payoffs.
If the Clinton Foundation investigation can establish a relationship between donations received and Hillary signing off on the uranium mine sales, the fact the emails she turned over re Rosatom did not spike commensurately with State Dept. cables on Rosatom would demonstrate intent in selective destruction of emails. The introduction of intent would allow a willing prosecutor to reach back for an indictment with certainty.
in particular check this out relating to the Russian Uranium scam that brought in huge money to the Xlintonista foundation:
"What could explain this lack of emails on the Russian Nuclear Agency? Were Clinton’s aides negligent in passing along unimportant information while ignoring the far more troubling matters concerning Rosatom? Possibly. Or, were emails on this subject deleted as falling into the “personal” category?
It is certainly odd that there’s virtually no email traffic on this subject in particular.
Remember that a major deal involving Rosatom that was of vital concern to Clinton Foundation donors went down in 2009 and 2010. Rosatom bought a small Canadian uranium company owned by nine investors who were or became major Clinton Foundation donors, sending $145 million in contributions.
The Rosatom deal required approval from several departments, including the State Department.
Read more:
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/07/hillary-clinton-missing-emails-secretary-state-department-personal-server-investigation-fbi-214016#ixzz4DkiJImJb Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
personally, it reads to me like a lot of emails were intentionally dumped around dates of important "donor" events for the Xlintonista Foundation. Strange?
Politico says “strange gaps” I say “illegal gaps”. Semantics really.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.