Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clintonfatigued

never agreed with her
but truly disappointed
i thoiught the supremes were above day to day politics
AND FOLLOWED THE STRICT INTERPRETATION OF THE CONSTITUTION..
evne if it went against your personalf eelings....
DISAPPOINTED
but not surprised


2 posted on 07/13/2016 3:31:26 PM PDT by zzwhale (no way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: zzwhale

Keep in mind that Ruth Buzzi-Bader Ginsburg is a liberal, and the so-called ethics rules are only advisory in nature. She may disregard them at her own volition, and since the great power conferred upon Supreme Court Justices is above challenge, then her course of action is perfectly logical. < /sarcasm >

Senility? If so, it should be definite grounds for dismissal from the Supreme Court bench she now holds. Is there basis for removal on such grounds?


15 posted on 07/13/2016 3:50:32 PM PDT by alloysteel (Of course you will live in interesting times, Nobody has a choice, now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: zzwhale

HAHAHA!!!!


26 posted on 07/13/2016 4:06:53 PM PDT by Osage Orange (FUBAR / SNAFU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: zzwhale
Liberals think they are immune from bipartisanship. Because the liberal media always has their backs, they sometimes get a little cocky.

Trump did a good job getting the liberal press to feel some shame and start reeling this one in. A GOP nominee from past years would have rolled over on his back and assumed the submissive position.


32 posted on 07/13/2016 4:28:51 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (Did you get pears?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson