Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Auntie Mame
-- This judge's ruling is sobering. She says you have no expectation of privacy, standing out in the open. --

Usually "reasonable" is decided by the jury. But when it comes to privacy, the government defines the reasonable expectation of privacy. Not many people know that SCOTUS first wiretapping decision concluded there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in any telephone call.

It is a mistake to think that the government will recognize any privacy that you don't deliberately and carefully create and guard.

6 posted on 07/27/2016 6:07:07 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

That particular decision came about in a time where there were banks of human operators manually switching calls where they needed to go and they needed to be able to hear the caller and recipient to route the calls. Technically, that was a correct decision for the day as you *had* to have a third party listening in just to get many calls accomplished.


13 posted on 07/27/2016 6:20:48 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson