Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Trump has a YUGE !! tax cut plan - Hillary not so much. Read the rest of the article for details. NOTE: Hillary wants to limit itemized deductions to 28% while Trump wants the Standard Deduction for married couples to be $50,000. GO Trump - Like it. PS: If webpage is too slow, go to "print" version - easier to read.
1 posted on 08/08/2016 6:41:47 AM PDT by bobsunshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: bobsunshine

Trump is for American jobs.

He is the first American politician in more than one entire generation, who has stood up, for working Americans.


2 posted on 08/08/2016 6:43:01 AM PDT by cba123 ( Toi la nguoi My. Toi bay gio o Viet Nam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bobsunshine

Mr. Trump!


3 posted on 08/08/2016 6:45:37 AM PDT by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bobsunshine

I’m concerned about latest poll numbers. Hoping it’s only a bounce for Hillary post-convention. If she wins I don’t want to think about the future of my kids/grand kids in the swamp she’ll turn our country into.


4 posted on 08/08/2016 6:50:42 AM PDT by sevinufnine (A moderately bad man knows he is not very good. A thoroughly bad man thinks he's alright. C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bobsunshine

I don’t vote my wallet. I vote for individual freedom. I’d rather be free and poor than rich but live in a gilded cage.


5 posted on 08/08/2016 6:52:48 AM PDT by Mr. Douglas (Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bobsunshine

Which candidate is better for your bottom line: A Communist or a Capitalist?


6 posted on 08/08/2016 6:52:49 AM PDT by GregoTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bobsunshine

The question should be, which one is better for America.


8 posted on 08/08/2016 6:54:05 AM PDT by mfish13 (Elections have Consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bobsunshine

Hillary is better for wealthier Americans. She is bought and owned by Wall Street.


9 posted on 08/08/2016 6:57:18 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bobsunshine

We are so taxed to death we don’t even know how much tax we really pay so there are plenty of wasteful programs and freebies that could be cut to alleviate the burden. I was pumping gas and happened to look at the tax we are paying per gallon and it was 20 cents on federal taxes and 18.4 cents on state taxes. That’s a lot of money right there. It made me think WHY do we have toll roads? Oh yeah...because they can. Cut the the pork and cut the corruption and we will have a reserve in no time...


10 posted on 08/08/2016 6:58:15 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bobsunshine
There is no choice. It has to be Trump. America is so far lost now that it would never recover with Hillary. And the entire establishment is proof that Trump is the only chance by their hard drive to out him. America is almost finished.

Trump for President.

11 posted on 08/08/2016 7:00:44 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bobsunshine

The whole no estate taxes are a scam. You are taxed on money that you are inherited. I wish that lie would go away.


12 posted on 08/08/2016 7:04:24 AM PDT by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bobsunshine
It’s very hard to imagine a single tax payer who wouldn’t be paying less in taxes under the Trump plan. There are tax cuts for the rich, the middle class, and for the poor.

The poor in 2016 would rather see the 1% have their taxes raised than have their own cut.


14 posted on 08/08/2016 7:06:21 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bobsunshine
What a foolish question, and a foolish way to analyze an economy and a political system.

It's like arguing over which level on the Titanic you'll occupy.

19 posted on 08/08/2016 7:17:55 AM PDT by gogeo (I am a proud Trumpublican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bobsunshine

What’s the point of analyzing Hillary’s “Proposal”? This lady lies more than she tells the truth.

We really have no idea what she will do, or had bad she will be for America, if elected.


22 posted on 08/08/2016 7:42:54 AM PDT by proudpapa (Trump 2016!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bobsunshine

“Clinton’s plan is carefully tailored to affect pretty much only households making over $250,000 in income.”

If a government systematically targets a group of people for any reason it makes them eligible for refugee protection under international law.

They might apply to say Switzerland or Singapore for asylum from Democratic tax persecution.


24 posted on 08/08/2016 8:02:50 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bobsunshine

I have proposed an scofflaw immigration amnesty in exchange for a package of Constitutional amendments on taxation, judicial power, benefit funding.

Here are some taxation limitations I propose:

1. a. for any person or entity (within any jurisdiction), 8% on total state (and local) income taxation
b. 8% total maximum on excise, occupancy, sales and use taxes of all types, except 100% maximums on telecom services and devices, motor fuel, sweeteners, food with over 12% fat and/or oil and/or over 2% added sugars by weight and alcoholic/containerized beverages and no maximums on tobacco or drugs, with existing federal excise taxation priority
c. no new government payment/purchase/provision mandate, federal tax or impost, excluding import duties
d. financial impositions on and related to privately owned real property (and its rental, repair, renovation and transfer) may only be made under state and local law and they shall be limited to:
A. annual real property tax on a residential building and its curtilage of up to:
1. $2 per square foot of any finished/cooled/heated/plumbed open plan area on the first floor or higher, plus
2. $150 if the open plan area includes a food preparation counter or cooking unit, plus
3. $300 per finished/cooled/heated/plumbed room not in a taxed open plan area
a. halved for half-baths, laundry rooms, attic/basement/over garage rooms not legal for bedroom use and
b. $0 on foyers, atriums, hallways, stairwells, closets, pantries, lanais, porches, and vehicular garages not legal for bedroom use
plus the following optional surcharge percentages
1. up to 15% to build/maintain public roads in the levying jurisdiction
2. up to 2% to provide free library service within 10 miles of the property
3. up to 2% to build/maintain public parks
4. up to 20%, if required by statewide law
less, in any tax year, 6% of the impact fees collected on the property in the prior twenty years
B. an annual tax of a percentage of up to 1.5% set by state law of market value on other real property
C. recording fees of up to $50/instrument, but no more than $100/transfer in total
D. impact fees of up to an absolute total of $6,000/housing unit and $2/square foot of enclosed non-residential space
E. total other construction related fees of up to $1 per square foot for a new building or on an existing building $30 plus $20 for each of the following trades involved: roofing, electrical, plumbing

Real estate tax caps alone might switch New York, New Jersey and Connecticut into our camp.

I know 95%+ of you are opposed to an immigration amnesty, but it is inevitable because most leading politicians of both parties want it - cheap labor for Republicans and surefire votes for Democrats.

I’ll trade the inevitable amnesty for permanent Constitutional tax/fee/fine&penalty caps.


25 posted on 08/08/2016 8:18:35 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bobsunshine

“Trump has a YUGE !! tax cut plan”

Federal tax cuts are unrealistic - each year we are spending hundreds of billions more than we are taking in.

The past federal tax cuts were only possible because most women entered the workforce in the 1970’s and 1980’s.


26 posted on 08/08/2016 8:28:13 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bobsunshine

Another possibility to swing the election our way is proposing a state tobacco tax cap under federal law, which Congress can do because it impacts commerce.

That would mainly crimp greedy blue state government greed and get us millions of smoker votes in places like California and the Northeast.


28 posted on 08/08/2016 8:35:32 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bobsunshine

I’m much more concerned about the Second Amendment. And the Rats are no friend of the Second Amendment.


29 posted on 08/08/2016 8:41:50 AM PDT by AlaskaErik (I served and protected my country for 31 years. Progressives spent that time trying to destroy it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bobsunshine
Hildebeeste is promising to raise taxes. I believe her.

Trump is promising to reduce taxes. I hope he's telling the truth.

Trump ... for a fighting chance.

31 posted on 08/08/2016 8:50:40 AM PDT by NorthMountain (Hillary Clinton: corrupt unreliable negligent traitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bobsunshine

I am on Soc Sec Disability but what good will it do me if Hillary wIns and we become a 3rd world country?


36 posted on 08/08/2016 11:55:48 AM PDT by stocksthatgoup (Don't argue with a Liberal. Ask him simple questions and listen to him stutter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson