Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America’s Next Mobile Howitzer Is a Danger to Its Crew
War is Boring ^ | August 12, 2016 | ROBERT BECKHUSEN

Posted on 08/12/2016 7:21:04 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

1 posted on 08/12/2016 7:21:04 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Have gun. Will travel.
Wire
Paladin
San Francisco.......


2 posted on 08/12/2016 7:27:21 PM PDT by Red Badger (Make America AMERICA again!.........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Keep thinking how efficient and deadly the German 88 crews were against mobile armor.


3 posted on 08/12/2016 7:28:55 PM PDT by headstamp 2 (Fear is the mind killer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

We may have a smaller Army but it’s going to be the most FABULOUS Army in history once everyone recovers from their sex change surgeries.


4 posted on 08/12/2016 7:34:07 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Let's Make Our Government and Founding Documents Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Maybe they should upgrade to the Panzerhaubitze 2000.


5 posted on 08/12/2016 7:40:52 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2
Actually the best German anti-tank weapon was the mobile assult gun known as the stugIII. It was more effective than any other anti-tank by a factor of 10. The 88 was a really good anti-aircraft gun in an army that was only given 37mm anti tank guns that proved ineffective against French and British tanks. So they used the 88s when ever they could in place of anti-tank guns for the first 2 years of the war.
6 posted on 08/12/2016 7:45:24 PM PDT by RedWulf (End Free trade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Want...


7 posted on 08/12/2016 7:51:27 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway - "Enjoy Yourself" ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I hope it’s as good as the Hover Tank.


8 posted on 08/12/2016 7:51:42 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Everywhere is freaks and hairies Dykes and fairies, tell me where is sanity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Swell


9 posted on 08/12/2016 7:51:53 PM PDT by Nifster (Ignore all polls. Get Out The Vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2
This is self-propelled artillery, not a tank.

Pity the DoD didn't see the need take advantage of Gerald Bull's services and products when they had the chance.

10 posted on 08/12/2016 7:53:31 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
If we are ever in another ground war where hundreds or even thousands of guns are lobbing rounds at each other, our Air Force will have failed.

Miserably.

Keep the A-10. Build some more if necessary. We should have at least 300 deployable at all times.

11 posted on 08/12/2016 7:58:18 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

12 posted on 08/12/2016 8:11:50 PM PDT by Pipe Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The Paladin is a shoot and scoot system, its not supposed to be around to get hit.

It gets a mission, stops, loads, fires, and moves. All in two minutes.

Static systems like towed arty are in danger of counter battery fire and truly dinosaurs against a nation that has competent artillery capability.


13 posted on 08/12/2016 8:17:27 PM PDT by Molon Labbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedWulf

“So they used the 88’s when ever they could in place of anti-tank guns for the first 2 years of the war.”

Of course, the German 88’s were still ripping up US tanks late in the war on the east side of the Rhine in 1945.


14 posted on 08/12/2016 8:24:31 PM PDT by oldplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RedWulf

15 posted on 08/12/2016 8:49:12 PM PDT by PLMerite (Compromise is Surrender: The Revolution...will not be kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
The Paladin M109A7 PIM — the latest in America’s line of tracked artillery pieces

I thought I remembered hearing that Rumsfeld cancelled the Paladin. But apparently the cancelled program was another self-propelled howitzer called Crusader that was supposed to replace the Paladin.

16 posted on 08/12/2016 8:50:19 PM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

Germany fields a rival to the Crusader that we probably should have considered more strongly now:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panzerhaubitze_2000

It has its limitations but it’s battle tested in Afghanistan and may be better than what we are going with as the upgraded Paladin.... oh well, too late now!


17 posted on 08/12/2016 9:00:04 PM PDT by Enchante (Hillary's new campaign slogan: "Guilty as hell, free as a bird!! Laws are for peasants!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RedWulf

I don’t think the Stug had an 88 though. I think it was a variant of the Panther’s 75mm


18 posted on 08/12/2016 9:34:27 PM PDT by 31R1O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

“a danger to its crew.” That’s a bit of a stretch. I was in A2 missile tanks. We had combustible cartridges on the main gun rounds some of which were stored in the turret. We didn’t think it was a danger to us. We took the usual safety precautions but its an armored fighting vehicle, not a frigging Mercedes Benz. Geez


19 posted on 08/12/2016 9:35:00 PM PDT by bravo whiskey (Never bring a liberal gun law to a gun fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 31R1O

NVM the Panther had a different 75mm.


20 posted on 08/12/2016 9:36:13 PM PDT by 31R1O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson