[dsm69]

Yep, when you try to “buy” a ruling from the Supreme Court, it means you are putting $$$ in some justices pocket to influence their decision. Last I checked, Supreme Court justices cannot take $$$ “donations” or “campaign contributions” in exchange for ruling in a particular way in a particular case.

[SSS Two]

Yep, when you try to “buy” a ruling from the Supreme Court, it means you are putting $$$ in some justices pocket to influence their decision. Last I checked, Supreme Court justices cannot take $$$ “donations” or “campaign contributions” in exchange for ruling in a particular way in a particular case.

"$$$ in some justices pocket"?

"$$$ 'donations' or 'campaign contributions' in exchange for ruling in a particular way"?

I don't think you read the article. This isn't what happened.

[i_robot73]

>
Yep, when you try to “buy” a ruling from the Supreme Court, it means you are putting $$$ in some justices pocket to influence their decision. Last I checked, Supreme Court justices cannot take $$$ “donations” or “campaign contributions” in exchange for ruling in a particular way in a particular case.
>

Well, they too are to base everything vs. the Constitution for their rulings.

I’d lean more toward your theory (in fact, I suspect it so) than I do to my point.