True ... and a strong circumstantial case can be made for their selling specific preferment and policy.
Then there is the small matter of time commitment.
Hillary, as we’ve seen, will take a healthy public salary but is rarely on the clock like her crony Obama aka the Marlboro Moron.
And while she is on the clock, she’s concerned solely with enriching herself. Paradoxically then, when she’s on the clock she’s really off the clock.
It’s worthwhile to look for malfeasance in office but what about plain old bone idleness as a legitimate reason to reject Hillary?
I don’t think Hillary’s middle east buddies wanted the Keystone pipeline built, or fracking on public land either. She probably lobbied Obama on the second issue. I would venture a guess that Obama is tied to this as well since he could act on these events.
A #NeverTrumper writing an article criticizing Hillary Clinton is an exercise in cynicism. FO, Goldberg.
Silly me—I thought this thread was about Hillary’s thighs and the medical devices attached to them. ;-)
As someone wrote in an article earlier in the week, it doesn’t make sense that the Clintons NOW promise to STOP doing something if she gets into the WH that they’ve always insisted wasn’t wrong anyway!
Logic???
And Jonah will still vote for her!! SAD, Jonah.