God’s Solution to the ‘Nones’ Who Have Left the Faith

Townhall.com ^ | August 26, 2016 | Michael Brown

[Kaslin]

An important new survey by Pew Research asks why people who were raised in religious homes but who now identify as religious “nones” – having no religious affiliation – decided to leave the faith of their childhood.

The results were varied, but according to the survey, “Half of ‘nones’ left childhood faith over lack of belief, one-in-five cite[d] dislike of organized religion.”

Of this half (more exactly, 49 percent) of “nones” who say they no longer believe, many “mention ‘science’ as the reason they do not believe in religious teachings” while others “reference ‘common sense,’ ‘logic’ or a ‘lack of evidence’ – or simply say they do not believe in God.”

Of the 20 percent who cite their dislike of organized religion are “some who do not like the hierarchical nature of religious groups, several people who think religion is too much like a business and others who mention clergy sexual abuse scandals as reasons for their stance.”

What is God’s solution to this growing problem of religious “nones”? It can be summed up in three words: truth, encounter, and consistency.

Specifically, I’m referring to biblically-based, academically-sound truth that answers the questions and refutes the lies; divine encounter, as in a real, life-transforming experience in God; and a consistent, Christian witness full of integrity and authenticity.

Of course, even with all this, there will be people who disbelieve and reject the faith, just as there have been in every age. But as we do a better job of disseminating the truth, as we help people come to know the Lord for themselves (as opposed to simply knowing about Him), and as we live out our faith without hypocrisy, many of these “nones” will return to God, while some will genuinely come to Him for the very first time.

With regard to truth, I am convinced that the more scientific discoveries we make, the more we must realize that there had to be a Creator. As expressed by the British astrophysicist Fred Hoyle, “A common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a superintellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature. The numbers one calculates from the facts seem to me so overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost beyond question.”

There is today a robust field of Christian apologetics focused on the questions of the origins of the universe and the claims of Darwinian evolution, and it includes highly-respected scientists and scholars who affirm unequivocally that all the evidence points to the existence of an intelligent Creator. There is also a growing body of learned Christian philosophers who are responding with clarity to the great moral questions of human suffering and apparent divine indifference.

Along with this are the many solid teachers and professors and authors who are providing sound responses to the wide-ranging attacks on the reliability of the Scriptures and the exclusive claims of the gospel. (There are Jewish scholars who are part of all these endeavors as well, with the exception of the specific defense of Christian beliefs.)

So, there are answers to the many questions that are being raised on university campuses and on the internet. We just need to do a better job of getting those answers out, thereby helping many of these “nones” regain their lost faith (and helping others not to lose their faith in the first place).

With regard to divine encounter, it is very possible, if not highly probable, that many of those who left the faith never were truly in the faith, meaning, they may have attended religious services and participated in religious rites, but they didn’t know the Lord for themselves. And religion without God can be boring, empty, dry, and even dangerous. As the German evangelist Reinhard Bonnke once commented, “Christianity, boring? So is television...if we don't plug in.”

Exactly.

Many people think that going to church makes one a Christian or being raised in a religious home makes one a believer, but our faith calls for a direct connection with the living God so that we become His daughters and sons. Without that, we have form without substance, activity without reality, the body without the spirit. Who wants that? To quote Rev. Bonnke again, “The less Holy Spirit we have, the more cake and coffee we need to keep the church going.”

One of the things we learn from the Old Testament is that every generation in Israel had to have its own encounter with God. Otherwise, when the elders would die out, the younger generation would fall away.

So today, America needs another great awakening, one which will convert the unconverted, restore the backslidden, and set the complacent on fire. Whether they know it or not, the “nones” are crying out for this very thing.

With regard to consistency, hypocrisy is a terrible turn off, especially when it comes to religious faith, since the world really does expect the Church to be different. That’s why scandals involving pastors and priests and rabbis are all the more noxious. They are supposed to be holy yet they are secretly doing the opposite of everything they preach and believe.

The younger generation in particular is looking for authenticity (which is one of the reasons for the rise of things like reality TV and homemade internet videos), and when God’s people demonstrate authenticity, showing a consistency between what we believe and what we do, practicing what we preach and preaching what we practice, this younger generation will be much more inclined to listen to our message.

So, the problem of people leaving the faith is real and should not be minimized. But the solutions are ready at hand and God is certainly longing to bring back His lost sheep.

Shall we work with Him to help recover these “nones” so that, in the coming years, we’ll be reading about the exciting new trend of those who are done with being “none”?

[pfflier]

None doesn't necessarily mean you don't believe in God. You just may not buy into whatever the organized religions pedal. I consider myself a reformed episcopalian but I still believe in God.

My dogtag said "no pref". If it came to that point, anyone could bless the mess as far as I was concerned. It came pretty close to that once..

[Da Coyote]

Methinks a large percentage of those who mention science as their reason for abandoning religion could not pass a freshman level “Physics for Poets” course, let along a real STEM course.

And as an aside, a 100 % guarantee of science stupidity is provided by those who object to the “man” in “freshman”.

[YogicCowboy]

While I substantively agree with Brown in this and other articles, I will post this caveat:

Truth does not equal science; science does not equal truth.

Science is merely a methodology, a mechanism, a tool. It is not a god, much less the God.

Elsewhere, Brown recently cited the two Johns-Hopkins psychiatric experts who asserted a lack of scientific evidence to validate the concepts of sexual orientation or gender identity.

So what? Next year, some other so-called experts may interpret selected data to produce the opposite conclusion.

Science is done by human beings, and human beings are faddish and fickle. If you rely on so-called scientists to prove your faith, then you will be cheated.

The heavens declare the glory of God - whether or not scholars and experts do.