Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DAVEY CROCKETT

Scientific American has fallen a long way in content over the years.


14 posted on 08/26/2016 3:21:21 PM PDT by Paladin2 (auto spelchk? BWAhaha2haaa.....I aint't likely fixin' nuttin'. Blame it on the Bossa Nova...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Paladin2
Scientific American has fallen a long way in content over the years.

I know, right? (As kids say) The Founders weren't using mathematics to determine who should be president. Arithmetic, maybe. I never thought of math as a way to shorten the word, arithmetic. Anyway it isn't about science, which is supposed to be about fact and logic, it's about politics which is a very emotional subject at times. You have to have a system which tempers the results of emotionally driven decisions because wars can start or genocides can happen or communists could take over.

46 posted on 08/26/2016 4:03:25 PM PDT by webheart (We are all pretty much living in a fiction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson