Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: miss marmelstein

I think it was because we had plenty. No great enemies the threat of nuclear arms and powerful armed forces couldn’t ultimately deter, and no real privations. We thought we could afford to entertain and even implement a lot of bunkum.

I think Lincoln claimed that it is not adversity that tests real character, but affluence.


6 posted on 08/31/2016 12:36:21 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: BradyLS

Ah! Here is the Lincoln quote I was trying to remember:

“Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man’s character, give him power.”


7 posted on 08/31/2016 12:49:49 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: BradyLS

You may very well be right.

I was thinking of Existentialism which came about because of the carnage of WWI and WWII.

It’ll take historians - honest historians - many years to figure out what went wrong.


8 posted on 08/31/2016 2:25:45 PM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: With my own people alone I should like to drive away the Muslims)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson