Posted on 09/04/2016 9:49:21 AM PDT by rktman
The little “journalist” can tell the difference between influence peddling and selling real estate. So dumbed down and useless, I feel sorry for him.
Why doesn’t someone point out that some of TRUMP’s “evil” money most likely was transferred to the U.S. Government in the form of TAXES (remember those?).
How much money went from the Saudi’s to the Clintons and thence to the Government coffers. Could they be “tax FREE?”
NYDailyNews fail!!!
Someone alert little Miss Brown that Trump wasn’t selling political favors under the ruse of a charity. I wonder if she’ll understand the difference.
“I am glad NYDN brings up this issue so everyone can hear
how Hillary illegally sold out the U.S.A. for personal
profits.” - (Quote from Code Toad)
Somehow I think that, unlike the rest of us, the Clintons are able to avoid those pesky “Taxes”.
My thoughts exactly.
A real estate developer sold a piece of real estate to a qualified buyer! And the evil capitalist even made a profit on the sale!
The horror!!
Not only was Trump selling a tangible product rather than access to a future office holder as Hillary was, Trump probably could not have legally refused to sell property to the Saudi’s in today’s business world.
Trump SOLD PROPERTY HE OWNED.
HILLARY SOLD STUFF THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OWNED.
HILLARY SOLD WHAT NEVER BELONGED TO HER - - SHE’S A FRIGGIN’ CRIMINAL.
She will surely try and get out of them.
Just curious if Trump had denied the sale to the Saudis it would be a huge issue of discrimination no?
Or if one of his hotels had refused to bake a cake celebrating 9/11 for the Saudis.
Not anywhere closely equivalent to the legal bribe taking by the Clinton Crime Family.
Trump made something, or purchased something then sold at a profit.
Hillary sold access to US policy makers and tax dollars.
Hardly a comparison.
The Saudi’s chose wisely.
Where to live and who to be landlord.
If they can’t see the difference between a real estate transaction and political donations for the purposes of gaining influence (i.e. a “Bribe”) then things are truly too far gone in the Media.
Don’t this stupid assed writer not know the difference between and business transaction and a bribe?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.