Hillary!™?"A Soviet spy in the United States revealed Tolkachev’s own spying in early 1985. The Soviet government executed Tolkachev in 1986."
Dramatizing the impact of espionage and lack of security precautions is precisely the missing link in the campaign against Hillary and her “secret” server.Trump might consider pointing out that if the Germans had seriously suspected that Normandy and not Calais was the Allies’ choice for invasion, they would simply have simply redeployed some of the Panzers which the Germans were holding in reserve far from Normandy. And that would have tipped the balance of power enough to have made the D-Day landing a disaster for America and Britain. The problem with using more modern examples is that it is still secret and we don’t know about them.
Pointing out Hillary’s malfeasances and crimes just is not effective with her supporters. You have to make people care about the consequences before it has any effect. They know about the malfeasance; they just have some silly “It’s only about sex” meme as a defense mechanism to protect their “liberalism."
Probably not. The Allies had sufficient air power to wipe out the Panzers during the day. Another infantry division would have been problematic but would have eventually fell.
Most Rats don’t give a “rats patoot” about national security, they consider it an archaic concept. Something forced on to society by the euro-centric, male dominated sub-Neanderthal racist ruling class.
In Zero’s case putting black skin in the White House was more important then what was inside it.
In Hellary’s case putting a vagina in the White House is more important then anything else. What’s attached to that vagina is just the necessary support mechanisms therefore not important.