[ETL]

it's really about the fact thus far Comfy couldn't ‘guarantee a win’ in pushing for an indictment regarding Hillary, if he didn't secure enough to do so then he would leave himself wide open for prosecution as Interfering with a US Presidential Race....and that's a long prison sentence.

In addition to that, they could also have something on him personally.

[BenLurkin]

THE REAL HILLARY CLINTON: Episode 29 - Filegate; Who Hired Craig Livingstone
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/836983/posts

[caww]

The Clintons make a point of getting dirt on people and if they can't find any they will indeed create it.....

I think Comfy went as far as he could in how he spoke to the American people...he did indeed let the facts be known as much as he could without putting himself in line for a jail sentence. Which the Clintons and Obamas would make certain he'd face. I actually think he told much more than they would have liked.

I was just listening to more of Hillary's rhetoric......it's very hard listening to her voice even when she tries not to sound like the witch that she is.....I can't for the life of me understand her supporters. But then it isn't about her as much as the party getting in itself...

[shotgun]

Can someone post the law that is being referred to here that he could have been charged with interfering with the election?

I would think that he would have some sort of immunity from prosecution. First off all he could do was recommend an indictment (which he famously declined to do), then it would have been up to the prosecutors to review the case and seek an indictment, before which they would have had to have the AG’s approval. And then it would have been up to the prosecutors to prove in court.

I just don’t see how gathering evidence, unless it was done fraudulently, would be cause to prosecute someone for interfering with an election.