So I don’t feel like listening to him. If someone here did, is he saying OUR SIDE can rig it or is he acknowledging that HIS SIDE can rig it?
This is another “We need the DHS to ensure the election”, little by little, they are building up to this.
Funny when a few weeks ago Trump talked about the possibility of a rigged election the DNC media mocked him for his nutcase “conspiracy” theories.
That was when the lying criminal was ahead by double digits.
Now that he is ahead in the polls all we are hearing about now from the DNC hacks is how easily election infrastructure can be hacked and that the federal government needs to take over the election, oh yes and it’s all the Russians’ fault!
If the Russkies participate in election rigging, it’s only because Hellary begged them to, in return for past (and treasonous) favors.
100 votes per machine X how many machines per polling place X how many polling places X 50 states = a crap-ton of fraudulent votes. And that doesn’t even begin to account for the 120% turnout in Demorat districts.
The Demorats will try everything they can to steal this election and when they lose they’ll broadcast loud and clear what their methods were by accusing the Republicans of those methods with their oh-so-typical projection.
In the 2012 election, didn't a precinct in one of the northern states submit more votes for the obozo than it had total registered voters? What ever happened with that?
I think Carville is just talking though his hat. We had a recount in our precinct last election. One loud lawyer kept complaining that the count was off. The ran the ballots though the machine numerous times and were within one vote every time. (Not exact, but within one.) He complained that it wasn’t perfect and every vote should count. (Which it should) I was impressed by how accurate it was.
I think that Mr Carville objects to the competition from overseas.