Posted on 09/07/2016 7:50:34 PM PDT by Freedom56v2
Yes, that is the problem, but I believe she told a NEW LIE tonight—she says nothing on her home server was marked with a Classified Header. Well, that may be true because her staff had to remove any Classified Headers from documents originating at the State Department on their secured servers...They just missed the small “c” in portions of the text. But she really was liying because the small C were not indexes and there were classified documents on her home server.
The new lie is that she said she “communicated about classified material on a wholly different system.”
Well, what system is that if she did not have State Department email account?
Will someone ask her this:
You were Secretary of State and you set up a private server. Correct?
Did you not expect to send or receive classified or higher emails while serving as SoS? Yes or no.
This is such a good question, you really should send to Trump campaign :)
You see something from the video ?
In Hillarys America, the political elite class is not accountable to the rule of law!
Lt. John Lester is more likely to be imprisoned than Hillaryous Rotten Criminal. Armed forces and spec ops used to shake down the world for CF. 3rd world superpower ALERT!
He needs to get some good security...
I was an IS in the USN from 90-94. Guys, I have literally seen sailors called out and threatened with the removal of their clearance for MUCH less. I saw a radioman completely destroyed by my Operations Officer for bouncing a $25 check at the commissary. It is appalling to me that this woman is even being considered for the highest office in the land. All the while stating that DJT should not be trusted with the “nuclear codes”.
In all fairness:
Second, at the end of her reply, she states that she communicated about classified information on a wholey [sic!] separate system....
Regards,
I did a bit of searching but realize I’m not well schooled in the subject. What I wonder is could she be referring to the fact that not all communications about relevant matters to her Sec. of State position occur via an EMAIL ACCOUNT?
There are other ways of communicating besides EMAIL.
I looked into the issue of what did Colin Powell supposedly do that is related if not exactly what she did.
I keep reading that he did not use a private server but that he did use an email account via an entity that provides email accounts and was not a State Dept. email account. Yet, somehow it makes sense to believe that every communication Powell made in his role as Sec of State was not made via email, regardless of what kind of email set up he had.
So Hillary could be referring to a different form of communication besides email, and in so doing she could simply be trying to divert attention from how she handled her email and private server.
How very Clintonian of her...
Well she has all this money and probably got steroid shots, meds and treatment. Some have been convinced she is some kind of invalid. Not me. One should never underestimate one's opponent.
She is obviously afflicted with serious health issues. The evidence is so out there and overwhelming.
Even a sick Clinton should NEVER be underestimated.
Good points; I will say that Powell was not using a home server, and no indication he was sending classified docs over the internet. My guess they were sending paper copies thru interoffice mail or courier.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-powell-clinton-email-commentary-idUSKCN10Y1HN
You are correct tho...she likely could claim the wholly separate system is face-to-face or interoffice, but it seems pretty lame story on her part IMHO. Why would anyone want to put up with decades old, old-fashioned communication systems with fax, interoffice, or courier.
However, they are the masters of double-speak...Very Clintonian of her indeed :(
Correct, Powell did not use a private server. He did use an email account that was not State Dept. As far as I know he has not been investigated for his actions in using email and handling classified material, so maybe we don’t know much about exactly what he did and didn’t do.
However, Hillary has told so many lies she is tripping on them. All that business about classified material needing headers so she could know they were classified yet her emails to and from didn’t have headers so how could she know if they were classified and just assumed they weren’t?
But in a different, earlier interview she said headers were not a mark of classification. That interview was on CBS.
This ignores the reason why her actions were so full of red flags, which is, she didn’t want her emails investigated. Obviously, because not only did she flim flam the rules but she had multiple thousands of emails deleted and had a system used to delete them that screams cover up.
Yep, that was a lie. It has already been established that the only system she used was her illegal private server.
She had 13 unsecured Blackberries and 5 unsecured iPads. (or iPhones) Are those the other means you’re referring to?
Powell used a State Dept. email account for official business.
The last eight years have been a cry for help that requires adult intervention.
Whatever period of time Hillary Clinton claims to have experience, the only time that really matters is 2009 to present, and during that time, America’s foreign policy has appeared erratic and irrational.
America has meddled in situations in the Middle East with even less foresight than in times past, and has had a major hand in creating the refugee crisis.
The policies have inadvertently, if not deliberately, led to the creation of ISIS and the continued presence of Al Qaeda elements, with a steady rise in terrorist atrocities throughout the world.
Relations with Russia have been allowed to slide over issues that could have been resolved relatively easily, and the opportunity to forge stronger links against common enemies has been squandered.
There is nothing much good to say on the China file either.
National security has been seriously compromised by the careless handling of sensitive information.
The only place where Hillary Clinton might improve on the current administration is that she would likely be less hostile to Israel and less rude to Great Britain than the current office holder, but of course, so would your local Starbucks barista.
Come to think of it, that might be a good job possibility for most of the current administration. They might be able to excel at a task as simple as getting a coffee together. Bill Clinton certainly thought so.
I was watching another program and only checked the NBC interviews during commercials. ... When the fem sidekick to Lauer introduced someone from the audience she made it a point to say “and he’s a Democrat”.
I never heard her say that someone was a Republican.
Did NBC just select Dems to ask questions or is that entire host vet organization just leftist-only?
All very true.
As an example; of what benefit was it to anyone in the world to destroy Libya?
Other than to ISIS by making it a giant training camp and supply depot for them.
Yeah...didn't her computer guy (the one that pleaded the 5th) set up her computer to receive all the State Dept e-mails....routed to her private server..
As Trump has been saying..."where is the guy that took the 5th?"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.