Posted on 09/07/2016 11:45:03 PM PDT by detective
Truncated title.
Full title:Clinton Foundation ‘Notable Member’ Matt Lauer Asks Zero Questions About Hillary Clinton’s Troubled Charity
Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton answered questions for 30 minutes during NBC’s “Commander-in-Chief forum” Wednesday night, and moderator Matt Lauer failed to ask the White House hopeful a single question about the myriad allegations that she used her position as secretary of state to sell access to major Clinton Foundation donors.
Lauer spent more than a third of the allotted 30 minute timeframe probing Clinton about her use of a private email server while sending and receiving classified documents but declined to ask one Clinton Foundation-related query.
The longtime Today Show co-host has ties to the Clinton Foundation himself. Lauer was once listed as a “notable member” of The Clinton Global Initiative, the fundraising conduit of the scandal-ridden Clinton Foundation.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Lauer was dishonest when he refused to ask any questions about Clinton foundation corruption.
Clinton also wore earpiece to receive coaching.
The fix is in.
Question: who was feeding the answers to Hillary?
Laur needs to have his head in a vice, then tightened to to the stops.
Clinton tonight claimed “I communicated about classified material on a wholly separate system.”
The claim of a second system is new.
In July FBI Director Comey disclosed that a number of e-mail sent or received by Clinton on her private system contained information classified as “confidential”. Since July the discovery of tens of thousands of additional classified e-mails sent or received by her private system has been reported. Both of these facts show Clinton’s claim tonight to be a lie, classified material was sent or received on her private system - not on a “wholly separate system” as claimed tonight.
She should be made to specify what the e-mail address was on this second system.
*** Has e-mail from this second system been provided to Congress? ***
Aside from this, was Lauer tough on her, as tough as he was on Trump?
Nice catch Ray.
Nothing mentioned on any cable news forums.
Thought l may have imagined l heard it.
Referring to this video of Clinton’s statements tonight: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDTPsnjD-FQ
At 7:50 - “I communicated about classified material on a wholly separate system.”
She’s being crafty with her language as well, speaking about a “classified system” and an “unclassified system” - as distinguished from a secured government system and an unsecured private system, which is the issue.
She insinuated that her private server was more secure than the State Department. I am mindful that “the State Department” has more than one type of compunter and communications system, but Crooked noted that the State Department was hacked, yet there is no evidence her private server was breached.
The Greatest Crime Couple in the history of the republic and their networks of criminals/disinformation specialists ALERT!
Hillary, Bill, Chelsea and Lauer should be in federal prison.
she was “Johnny on the Spot” with her answers, she was well practiced and rehearsed with them.
At the end Lauer even tried to help her with her last answer.
Also of note, when the guy in the audience asked Trump a question, Lauer busted out a Trump quote directly related to the question from several years before. Did Lauer have 100,000 quotes memorized and the dates they were made? Of course not, what he read was a rehearsed follow up to the plants question.
The audience had plants and planted questions.
That so-called “forum” was NOTHING but a circus, dog and pony show. I have no doubt Clinton had been previously coached with the questions BEFORE the event even took place. Audience questions were “hired hands” with pre-rehearsed/planted “questions” which would be giant softballs for Clinton. Definitely a waste of time to even watch.
The bitch needs to be put under some HEAVY questioning and then watch her fail. Trump can expect such treatment.
An organization is created, but it does not register truthfully or in each jurisdiction where it operates—so, it slips through regulatory cracks.
Trustees are selected , but they are not independent or even disposed to carry out their duties-—in many cases, they are central actors in the fraud.
An accounting firm is chosen, but the professionals doing the work agree to look the other way, and perform only perfunctory checks instead of the rigorous ones that are required under applicable laws and regulations.
Marketing campaigns begin, in many cases using the internet and a variety of names including that of the actual “charity”, but also using myriad addresses. Donations flow towards the charity, particularly if the causes sound appealing and the people supposedly involved seem credible.
The most devious step in charity fraud is the next one—corrupt operators siphon off as much of the incoming flows as they believe they can get away with. The balance, less sums diverted and/or stolen, is “declared” as incoming contributions. Then, if corrupt operators choose to compound their felonies, they can arrange for a charity to claim it paid inflated sums to crooked third parties (including other illegally organized and operated “charities”.) and then siphon off more money.
It takes a special band of brigands to divert sums from needy souls for private gain and for political benefit. Yet, a vast record already in the public domain suggests this is exactly what members of the extended Clinton family and their associates have done for nearly 20 years, hiding their rampant criminality in plain sight.
Charles Ortel
Piscopo just mentioned the plug in her ear??? AM970 the answer NY radio.
#13 analysis BUMP!
all is fair in propaganda fests except shooting the moderator
Thats a hearing aid. See if you can’t find them in other pictures. They are probably there too. I have been on air at NBC. Their ear pieces are different than that.
That’s just dumb. To think the ear piece was provided by NBC is just plain foolish
The ear piece was provided by the campaign
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.