Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carthego delenda est
"That would have paid for 8 of these destroyers!"

And the price for each of these would pay for six or seven Burke class destroyers.

No matter how good it is, it can only be in one place at one time, not six or seven places or five places with ship rotation depending on whether it's a wartime or peacetime deployment.

I also don't see how when it comes to defending carriers how it is superior to having four to six Burke class ships sailing with the carrier.

55 posted on 09/09/2016 6:01:22 AM PDT by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Rashputin

And the price for each of these would pay for six or seven Burke class destroyers.

I believe that your point is essentially correct, but that the total cost of ownership would probably be quite different. Personnel, Operations and Maintenance costs add up to a lot over the lifecycle. The real cost might be a lot lower or higher than purchase price would indicate.

The big value might have been just keeping the industrial, research and development base from falling apart during the Obama years.


56 posted on 09/09/2016 8:10:01 AM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: Rashputin; Carthego delenda est

.
>> “I also don’t see how when it comes to defending carriers how it is superior to having four to six Burke class ships sailing with the carrier.” <<

In short, it reduces the required manpower.
.


57 posted on 09/09/2016 8:16:28 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson