Posted on 09/09/2016 4:35:27 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
It was easy to deduce from the whines of Hillary Clinton's supporters which candidate had underperformed worst in Wednesday night's MSNBC Commander-in-Chief veterans' forum.
Likewise, the Clinton campaign's abrupt decision Thursday to hold her first press conference in nine months (short and inadequate though it was) spoke to a mild desperation, a need to get the media covering something other than her performance the night before.
The worst moment at the forum for Clinton came when a veteran who had held a job that involved handling classified information asked a question. The man began by noting that if he had passed classified information through email, "I would have been prosecuted and imprisoned." He went on: "Secretary Clinton, how can you expect those such as myself who were and are trusted with America's most sensitive information to have any confidence in your leadership as president when you clearly corrupted our national security?"
It was a loaded question, but a relevant and justified one, given the candidate's unprecedented carelessness with classified information while serving in President Obama's cabinet.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
Talk about sanitizing reality. There's plenty of evidence to support the contention that she went to extreme lengths in an attempt to prevent any of these messages to be discovered and retrieved. That's a deliberate -- and criminal -- act, not one of carelessness...
This opening sentence implies that both Trump and Clinton underperformed.
Bias, anyone?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.