Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[N. Korea] The Enduring Beijing-Pyongyang Axis
WSJ ^ | Sept. 19, 2016 | David Feith

Posted on 09/19/2016 8:39:09 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

The Enduring Beijing-Pyongyang Axis

Ideology drives much of China’s support for North Korea.

By David Feith

Sept. 19, 2016 7:34 p.m. ET

14 COMMENTS

The 5.1-magnitude explosion at North Korea’s Punggye-ri nuclear testing site this month didn’t shake China’s loyalty to the Kim regime in Pyongyang. While U.S. and South Korean leaders increasingly call for crippling sanctions intended to make Kim Jong Un choose between his regime’s survival and its nuclear program, China may not support even an incremental tightening of sanctions at the United Nations.

As experts around the world typically tell it, China protects its despotic and often uncooperative neighbor for two main reasons: It doesn’t want instability in North Korea to send refugees and other chaos across its border, and it doesn’t want U.S. or U.S.-allied South Korean troops deploying along that frontier. But other factors carry significant weight, too—namely, communist solidarity, the legacy of Mao Zedong and the importance of ideology in Chinese decision-making.

North Korea is no mere Chinese client state (as, say, Burma used to be). It is a formal communist ally, and the crucible that forged the alliance—the Korean War—remains an important part of China’s Mao mythology. To undermine North Korea, then, would risk a self-inflicted ideological blow that Chinese leaders may be unwilling to accept. Especially if it means siding with the U.S., China’s old Korean War foe that Beijing increasingly portrays as an enemy again today.

(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; koreanwar; nkorea
Basically, what this article is saying is that China is a hostage to a flawed historical narrative, the narrative integral to legitimizing communist rule.
1 posted on 09/19/2016 8:39:09 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; endthematrix; ...

P!


2 posted on 09/19/2016 8:39:40 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Possibly China won’t reign in the Norks because they’re fellow commies, but I think China likes all the expense and trouble the Norks cause the US.


3 posted on 09/19/2016 8:41:38 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus

North Korea is a proxy.

What has China got to lose if N.K. hits the U.S. with nukes?

It’s a free hit. How could they take a pass on that?


4 posted on 09/19/2016 8:47:52 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Fifty-five days until we take measures to end this nightmare. Trump, for the Free World...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus
all the expense and trouble the Norks cause the US.

Lately, the cost keeping N. Korea around is rising. To outsiders, the cost is seemingly outweighing the benefit. This article is an attempt to find out a missing piece.

5 posted on 09/19/2016 8:50:25 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

“communist solidarity, the legacy of Mao Zedong and the importance of ideology in Chinese decision-making.”

Yes.

There has been a whitewashing of China’s interests and beliefs that is very similar to the refusal to say Islamic Terror.


6 posted on 09/19/2016 9:20:07 PM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Correction:

Lately, the cost [of] keeping N. Korea around is rising.

7 posted on 09/19/2016 9:31:08 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

The norks are the conduit through which the chicoms proliferate their nukes, missile systems and failed belligegerency to 3rd world despots with implausible deniabiliy.


8 posted on 09/19/2016 11:17:33 PM PDT by Eagles6 ( Valley Forge Redux. If not now, when? If not here, where? If not us then who?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
The geronts in the Chinese Communist party can not be happy:

The word “communism” was removed from the North Korean constitution in 2009 revisions and from to the Workers’ Party regulations in 2010 revisions.

“Chairman Kim Jong Il said, ‘Communism is not being grasped. I'll need to properly try socialism,’” the North Korean representative in dialogue with the reporter responded. The journalist then asked what was meant by “communism is not being grasped.”

The North Korean explained the statement by saying, “Communism describes a society wherein there is no demarcation between the exploited class and the exploiting class. As long as America is still around, it will be very difficult for that to come to fruition.” In other words, the prospect of achieving a classless society - the ideal communist society - was viewed as unrealistic. The solution was to turn to socialism instead.

However, between then and now, North Korea has also deleted “socialism” from its lexicon. What’s more, the phrase chosen to replace the deleted word is “Kimilsungungism- Kimjongilism.” Kim Jong Il removed ‘communism’ and Kim Jong Un removed ‘socialism.’ In their place, the regime has highlighted the cult of leadership through the formalization of “Kimilsungist-Kimjongilist ideology.”

http://www.dailynk.com/english/read.php?num=14060&cataId=nk03600

9 posted on 09/20/2016 11:20:46 AM PDT by AdmSmith (GCTGATATGTCTATGATTACTCAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
This is all that remains of the old communists:


10 posted on 09/22/2016 7:39:09 AM PDT by AdmSmith (GCTGATATGTCTATGATTACTCAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; endthematrix; Dog

THAAD:

The United States and South Korea are destined to “pay the price” for their decision to deploy an advanced missile defence system which will inevitably prompt a “counter attack”, China’s top newspaper said on Saturday.
China has repeatedly promised to take specific steps to respond since the THAAD decision was announced, but has given no details about what it may do.

The United States and South Korea have said THAAD does not threaten China’s security or target any country other than North Korea.

http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-southkorea-usa-china-idUKKCN1212XJ


11 posted on 10/01/2016 2:43:04 AM PDT by AdmSmith (GCTGATATGTCTATGATTACTCAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson