[SERKIT]

I truly hope Chaffetz and Gowdy have good security details. The Clintons scare the hell out of me. You have to wonder what this young man has been threatened with regarding any bean-spilling.

[unixfox]

Just like the held Lois Lerner in contempt.

As she flips us the finger.

[Revel]

We still have not heard anything about congress’s recent letter to the company that ran the email server. Interview Appointment dates were supposed to have been set for its employees by last Friday.

[CMailBag]

They just as well save it until 1-21-17.

[kaehurowing]

Watcha’ doin’ about the end of the internet, Congress?

Clock’s a tickin’.

[Paladin2]

Shouldn't the House be working on regular order instead of lame ducking continuing resolutions? They also should be working to save the Internet.

Where is PRYNO?

[Liz]

Hillary's email coverup operation and deliberate destruction of govt property was so vast, at least five State Dept govt employees, including Clinton’s top suck-up, Cheryl Mills, needed DOJ immunity deals to avoid prosecution....and to prevent Obama from being implicated.

By Robert Gehl, Federalist Papers
Hillary didn't know and Cheryl Mills didn't know either (250 times)

She doesn’t recall, she doesn’t recollect. She’s not sure. She just doesn’t know. Hillary Clinton’s counsel, chief of staff (and US govt employee), doesn’t know a lot of things. She can’t remember testimony she gave. She isn’t sure if she spoke to anyone – she doesn’t remember Hillary’s email address, she doesn’t even know who might know anything. During seven hours of testimony before Judicial Watch, Cheryl Mills said “I don’t know” or some variation of ignorance at least 189 times. (Hillary didn't know 50 temes and blamed a blood clot on her brain for her forgetfulness).

Mills is clearly adept at finding ways to proclaim her ignorance. She was Bill Clinton’s counsel during the impeachment proceedings in the 1990s and has been a close advisor for both Bill and Hillary Clinton for decades.

Breitbart compiled a list of the near-200 times Mills declared how little she knows.

READ HERE http://thefederalistpapers.org/us/what-cheryl-mills-doesnt-know-could-last-seven-hours-wait-it-does

[Attention Surplus Disorder]

I don’t understand why there is a vote.

They subpoena’ed him.

He didn’t show.

That is contempt.

Right now.

Like A = A. Or X = X.

There is no decision to make, this isn’t an FBI deciding to not prosecute HRC. It is a perfect equivalence.

[mtrott]

“Outraged committee Democrats decried the move as an abuse of power that violates rules against harassing witnesses.”

Well, how does issuing a subpoena to a witness constitute “harassing”? Harassment would occur when when a witness is actually giving testimony, which this guy is refusing to do.

[Noamie]

Can a body harass a witness who will not... Uhm, Witness?

[onedoug]

They’re turning the tiny screws. It’s the big ones need that.

[a fool in paradise]

And Nana Hillary wasn’t being contemptuous when she mockingly responding, “you mean with a rag?” when asked if she’d wiped the servers?!!

[a fool in paradise]

Simple facts, if there were no crimes committed, why were so many people in this case granted IMMUNITY?

[yefragetuwrabrumuy]

When president Trump is elected, he really needs to light a fire under congress: if someone is in contempt of congress, they need to go to jail. Three to six months to ponder their behavior is good.

If someone in the executive branch shows contempt to congress, that should amount to their resignation, unless it is an authorized presidential challenge to what congress is demanding, given officially and in writing by the president.

[Fester Chugabrew]

“So what if I’m held in contempt of Congress? I hold Congress in contempt! Moreover I hold all those ignorant deplorables who cling to their guns and Bibles in contempt. Screw them all.”

---

I’m Hillary Rodham Clinton, and I . . . uh . . . prove this message.