Trump pledges ‘extremely rough’ attacks on Clinton over husband Bill’s AFFAIRS in debate

Express-UK ^ | September 28, 2016 | Charlie Bayliss

[Little Ray]

Bill ain’t runnin’ for office.

If you want to attack Hillary! as a serial rapist’s enabler, or his accessory, that is fine. But attacking Bill Clinton is a waste of time or even counter productive.

A lot people, ‘Pubbie and Democrat, remember the Clinton administration pretty fondly, unfortunately.

[polymuser]

Misdirection?

He’s got plenty of other relevant stuff with Hillary’s past...

http://downtrend.com/admin/9-hillary-clinton-scandals-you-may-have-forgotten

[nitzy]

The winning strategy....

Hillary - some lame reference to Trump being misogynistic

Trump - "It is really digraceful for someone like you, with your background to criticize someone else's treatment of women. You have a long and terrible record of personally attacking and intimidating the victims of sexual assault in order to protect the predator who committed the assault. I think you should apologize for what you did."

Hillary - "That is real low bringing family into this. Let's keep this debate between you and me."

Trump - "I wasn't referring to Bill's sexual assault of Kathleen Willie or Paula Jones or Juanita Broderick. I was referring to the 13 year old rape victim who you attacked and said was asking for it when you defended her attacker. If anyone at home wants to see video of Hillary laughing about freeing this little girl's attacker my official twitter will be tweeting out a link to the video in a minute or two."

[AFret.]

I’m surprised Trump hasn’t touched the Hillary defended a child rapist and bullied his victim issue. That is kryptonite right there against Hillary’s “fighting for children” nonsense.

---

Spot on! He should also remind the audience that as a young lawyer, hillary was fired by the Watergate Commission for lying and incompetence..40+ years ago!

[Right Brother]

Has anyone here considered that this may be misdirection by the Trump campaign?

[peeps36]

He needs to attack her for using the government to make herself and her friends multi millionaires. Hit her on her $250,000 five minute speeches to the big banks. They weren't paying to hear her talk, they paid for special treatment.

[HamiltonJay]

I have no issue if He wants to respond when accused of being mean to women, of bringing up HILLARY’S treatment of Monica and Flowers and what not... that’s fine, and fair game.

However to just go off on fact her husband was a letch, and she stood by it... that’s not a great win.. But If he goes after her for her actions to try to destroy the women he slept with.. then that’s game and I have no issue with that.

[Aetius]

That’s a good point. It may well be. With Trump, who knows really?

[cowboyusa]

He said he would be rougher on Clinton. Nowhere in the article did he say he would go after Bill’s affairs. I hate the media so much!

[EnquiringMind]

Thanks - I was flamed on hot coals the other day for suggesting that seating Gennifer FLowers in the front row at the debate would be a very large mistake. I agree with you. Let’s hope Kellyanne and Ivanka take care of it.