Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: old-ager

“I also kind of like the idea that legal concealed carriers were required by law to have some training.”

I agree. I think they should have 6 years of training and prove perfect marksmanship under extreme conditions and excessive ranges.

What part of “shall not be infringed” do you not understand? It irritates the hell out of me for someone who will claim to be conservative make the same arguments as any liberal. Training (while not a bad idea) is infringement, as well as licenses.


13 posted on 10/07/2016 7:55:45 AM PDT by suthener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: suthener

You’re FOS on this point, friend. You have the same natural right to acquire and drive a car that you have to defend yourself and others. The Constitution doesn’t give you any rights. It only limits government. The fact that it does not mention that your right to acquire, keep and use means of transportation means absolutely nothing.


14 posted on 10/07/2016 8:49:32 AM PDT by old-ager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson