Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: old-ager

No, I’m not FOS and your argument doesn’t make sense. I don’t recall a natural borne right to keep and drive cars. I also assure you that I know not only what the constitution says but it’s meaning and purpose as well. I honestly don’t think you do.


18 posted on 10/07/2016 5:59:08 PM PDT by suthener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: suthener

Your right to move around is not enumerated in the Constitution. Yet you assert it, and if you assert it by driving, you acquired a driver’s license, and submitted to its terms. In the past, driver’s education was provided in the public schools, and most people thought it was a good thing. You can’t say that moving around is less important than self defense. They are both “natural rights.”

“Education” is mandated by the government, and we accept it. Why would mandating firearms education be a step in the wrong direction? It used to be common in our high schools.


19 posted on 10/11/2016 10:53:44 AM PDT by old-ager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson