WIKILEAKS BOMBSHELL: Hillary Advisors Admit She “HATES EVERYDAY AMERICANS”

The Gateway Pundit ^ | October 11, 2016 | Jim Hoft

[kiryandil]

Hey, don’t sell yourself short. You’re a great poster. :)

[kiryandil]

It would be interesting to track the Kandy Grinch’s behavior after that date... :)

[Spktyr]

Yes, she prefers the term ‘peasants’ - or better yet, ‘serfs.’

[ColdOne]

thank you for link

[Jamestown1630]

It’s pretty plain to me that she has a penchant for putting hundreds of thousands of us into ‘vessels’ like baskets and buckets.

What’s the real difference?

-JT

[Does so]

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3599

[Chickensoup]

Who wrote this Podesta?

[metmom]

She began to hate everyday Americans a LONG time ago.

She’s really just continuing to hate us.

I’ll still sleep like a baby tonight.

[right way right]

Commies always hate the bourgeoisie.

[Lent]

Wow whoever would have thunk she is an equal opportunity hater - black, white, brown don’t matter as long as they are of the ‘everyday American’ variety.

[bray]

Is there anyone in America she does like?

Pray America wakes

[Windflier]

Sounds like some kinda double reverse logic there, bubba.

I’m all for pinning some dirt on Hillary, but it needs to be something concrete. This thing is a red herring.

[kiryandil]

It's still a grenade rattling around their foxhole.

They have to stop, and deal with it.

Don't you get it? You just say - the email says this.

Then the dominos fall - you don't have to do ANYTHING.

They have to do all the work rebutting it - all because Podesta is an overpaid, lazy hack. :)

[Windflier]

“He forgot the quotes, but you can infer them from “I think we should use it”. The sentence only makes sense if he means Hillary has tired of the phrase.”

That whole email is inexplicable, unless you read it within the context that he’s speaking about a campaign phrase or slogan.

As I said before, we need to ignore false leads like this. There will be real dirt on the Clintons. No need to chase red herrings.

[Windflier]

“Don’t you get it? You just say - the email says this. Then the dominos fall - you don’t have to do ANYTHING.”

That only works if you’re a Democrat. Our side is never given the benefit of the doubt in these kinds of situations.

Reading the email within the proper context is the only way to make sense of it. Try to make it sound like something it’s not, and you simply invite ridicule and well deserved attacks from the other side.

Chasing this thing makes us look desperate, which is a trap they’d love for us to step in.

[napscoordinator]

But but but he said pu$$y.