Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wikileaks: PR Firm Seeks Clarification on Hillary’s Support of 25% Gun Tax
brietbart ^ | 11 Oct 2016 | AWR Hawkins

Posted on 10/11/2016 11:19:26 AM PDT by Cheerio

One of the emails contained in the October 7 Wikileaks email release shows Grunwald Communications asking Hillary Clinton’s press secretary about the candidate’s support for “a 25 percent tax on gun sales.”

The email is dated October 4, 2015 and was sent from Mandy Grunwald to Brian Fallon. In it, Grunwald asked about Clinton’s reported vacillation on gun control in the 2008 campaign and also about the tax. She said, “I also saw something about her supporting a 25% tax on gun sales back in 1993.”

ABC News reports that Clinton was “unequivocal” in her support for such a tax during her husband’s presidency. On June 5, 2016, she told George Stephanopoulos her support for the tax was part of the nationalized healthcare push. She said, “What I was saying back then was that we have a lot of public health costs that taxpayers end up paying for through Medicaid, Medicare, through uncompensated care, because that was in the context of the push for health care reform and that we needed some way to try to defray those costs.”

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: banglist; clinton; guns; tax

1 posted on 10/11/2016 11:19:26 AM PDT by Cheerio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

Mandy Grunwald...still holding the middleweight belt for ugliest human being on the planet.


2 posted on 10/11/2016 11:23:30 AM PDT by relictele (Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The Ends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio
I had not heard of this. Does she really think this is going to dissuade someone with malevolent intent from buying a gun? This is just a revenue-raising scheme and has no hope of making a dent in crime.

Another possible explanation is that liberals don't want conservatives to own guns. Conservatives are "too dangerous" to own guns. Really?


3 posted on 10/11/2016 11:25:51 AM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

Just when Y over Y sales increase slacks off, the gun salesmen get into action.


4 posted on 10/11/2016 11:25:51 AM PDT by Paladin2 (auto spelchk? BWAhaha2haaa.....I aint't likely fixin' nuttin'. Blame it on the Bossa Nova...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack

Nice graphic.


5 posted on 10/11/2016 11:28:26 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: relictele
Samantha Power wins that one.
6 posted on 10/11/2016 11:33:58 AM PDT by Carriage Hill ( Peace is that brief glorious moment in history, when everyone stands around reloading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: econjack

Those numbers are low IMHO.


7 posted on 10/11/2016 4:41:44 PM PDT by piytar (http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-number-one-bullet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson