Wasn’t there DNA on the blue dress?
This can be easily proven or dismissed, it seems.
RE: Blue Dress
That was already DNA tested by the FBI laboratory, and matched to Clinton with a very high degree of probability. Really we don’t need another DNA sample from the dress, or from Clinton himself, if we could just get our hands on the DNA profile that the FBI already assembled.
The problem is, I believe the actual DNA profile is still kept confidential by the FBI as part of an agreement made when Clinton agreed to supply his blood sample for comparison. They released the results of the test, but not the DNA profiles themselves:
“Kendall wrote Bittman again, agreeing that the president would provide the requested sample under several conditions. Kendall’s letter said their correspondence and the test results should be treated confidentially”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/eviblood092298.htm
Yes, there was dna on the blue dress, but Ken Starr used the dna only to prove it belonged to Clinton. It was not the full dna that could be used thereafter for paternity, fr’instance. Or so I read the other day, I think on the UK Daily Mail online. The UK Daily Mail also had a picture of the dress and said it was up for auction????