Getting to the MSM; VANITY

Myself | 10.17.2016 | crz

[crz]

One way to make the MSM pay attention and report the criminal acts of the Clinton Crime Inc.

[crz]

I did this today. I noted all the adverts and who bought avert time on the networks. Then, started calling these outfits and told them that I saw their add on such and such-ABC, CBS, NBC and so on. I told them I will never purchase ANYTHING from them as long as they advertise on these networks unless, they convince them to do their job and become newsworthy again. Got quite a reply from a few. Saying they have been considering pulling adds from certain TV networks and going local.

[Kevin in California]

IOW, a boycott.

[b4me]

Better than a boycott since anyone can just stop purchasing or using some thing without he company knowing why, but letting the company know why and giving them an option to win you back if they want, and getting response from companies - that seems like it can really make an impact.

[LouieFisk]

“told them that I saw their add on such and such”
==
Of course, the downside to telling ‘em that is they know where people are seeing the ads they placed, i.e. where to make more ad buys. You would have to have a massive, yuge group action for this to have any impact at all. They can blow off a few dozen “cranks” when 500,000 eyes are still on their ads.

[Byron_the_Aussie]

.. started calling these outfits and told them that I saw their add on such ..

Really good. Every little bit counts and don't let any naysayer tell you otherwise.

[FreeperCell]

They are a lot slower than we are. They have no media that presents the same thing. Your girlfriend, wife, daughter is still sucked up into it. welcome to cutting edge theory.

[seastay]

Or call them up and ask if they are still in business and tell them you are asking because you never hear them advertise on your favorite show .. implying they are waisting their money on government propaganda programming,

[RitaOK]

Nice job. And you talked out your reasons.
Very important to communicate. And you got a response.

BRAVO!

[arrogantsob]

There is no downside since ratings are collapsing across the board even for NFL games.

[SteveH]

nice idea bump

[Organic Panic]

I am willing to bet the Clintonistas have a fund set up to give taxpayer dollars to reimburse companies for any lost ad revenues from losing the “deplorable” audience.

I have sent my complaints to many companies and all I get back is “we take your concerns very seriously.”

[Pollard]

Hmmm, Maybe if they all got a half million letters simply stating.....Stop Sponsoring Hillary Clinton’s Defense on CNN - MSNBC - etc
Or Stop Allowing our Elections to be Swayed by Advertising on CNN - MSNBC

Taking it to the advertisers if definitely a good idea because it hits them in the purse.

Protesting outside these company’s headquarters could help too. They’re not ALL in Calif and NY.

I don’t see why, if Trump’s rallies bring 15,000 people, why we can’t get 15,000 people outside of CNN’s headquarters protesting.

Maybe pull a BLM and block some interstates. Would they cover it?

[randita]

People just stopped watching the NFL. No muss, no fuss. They just tuned out. Everyone knows why but the NFL won’t admit it.

It will make an impact if you just tune out the major networks and liberal cable news networks.

Don’t visit ANY of the major print media’s websites. You click on their website, they gotcha. NEVER visit NYT, WP, or any of dozens of other blatantly liberal print or network websites.

Just pretend they do not exist. It will make an impact, believe me. Just like the impact the NFL is getting. Advertising will dry up when readership and viewership does.