Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bobsunshine

I just have to ask. Would you not test these machines before the election?


23 posted on 10/25/2016 10:27:57 AM PDT by WENDLE (Hillary provided Weapons to ISIS!! There is no doubt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: WENDLE

Each county must have hundreds of machines. The Election office will not check all of them, or maybe even any of them. Having worked as a precinct voting inspector, our instructions were to plug in the machine, make sure the ballot was proper, and then have the machine do it’s own internal diagnostic test. We had no way of checking the type of vote switching chicanery happening here. And for that matter, the election board probably didn’t either. The “error” does not take place until an actual ballot is being cast once the machine goes live.

It’s a pretty well written code error; whoever programmed it has knowledge of how the equipment is handled and tested, and how they can make it happen only when the ballot is being cast. And damn right, it’s deliberate.

I’ve posted before that the DNC has a political map of the United States down to the precinct level, and they also have very good internal poling. They know exactly how many votes they need to manufacture to get to 270 Electoral Votes. They can target the heavily democrat and democrat supervised precincts in the swing states, and “preload” the machines with the right number of votes to take the state. Of course, with a little extra padding to be sure.

We are watching it play out now. And the fact that they think they can swing Texas this way is not encouraging.


38 posted on 10/25/2016 10:45:04 AM PDT by henkster (Better to be Pavlov's Dog than Schroedinger's Cat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: WENDLE
I just have to ask. Would you not test these machines before the election?

That does not necessarily help. Software can be coded with date/time sensitive switches to run intermittent fraud routines only on the day(s) of an election. It is easy to do.

Legal standard "chain-of-custody" procedures from source-code to installed binary form on the machine must be followed. The source code itself must be audited by competent outside engineers.

None of this is actually done with current electronic voting machines. This is why they cannot be trusted.

When there is enough incentive for fraud, there will be fraud, especially when events are time-critical and the chance for punishment is small. Fraud leaves traces just like what is being reported.

54 posted on 10/25/2016 11:20:56 AM PDT by flamberge (What next?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson