Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote

I think it might have something to do with pirated films and music, and I suppose books and even blog posts. In some countries, such as the UK, the government is empowered to prosecute copyright infringers on behalf of copyright holders. If someone downloaded 1000 movies from a torrent site, the government could fine that person tens of thousand of pounds, the cost of buying each film, and give that money to the film distributors/owners. In the US, copyright holders have to pursue their own cases of infringement one by one. And most websites that host the pirated films are immune from prosecution under the digital act Clinton signed. I can see where the Democrat’s major patrons in entertainment would love to be able to use the government to enforce copyrights for them. Government has abilities such as the use of force, ability to obtain warrants and wiretaps, etc that copyright holders don’t have.


10 posted on 10/25/2016 10:47:14 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


bmk


11 posted on 10/25/2016 11:34:07 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson