Posted on 10/31/2016 6:37:10 AM PDT by COUNTrecount
Haven't seen new emails from WikiLeaks the past few days....nothing juicy?
There is absolutely no way, no way whatsoever, they can look and cross reference 10s of thousands of emails between now and november 8, and know if any of were classified at the time they were sent, etc.... Any report coming out before election day claiming there is no evidence relevant in this would be a lie.
Someone here was saying the PD in North Carolina has all copies as well. (Location of the juvenile female.) Don’t know if that’s true or not.
Someone here was saying the PD in North Carolina has all copies as well. (Location of the juvenile female.) Don’t know if that’s true or not.
#GodBlessTheNYPD
#GodBlessJulian
#GodBlessAnonymous
#GodBlessOKeefe
#GodBlessDONALDTRUMP
#BanishHer2Haiti
#HaitiansWantTheirMoney
#LimbFromLimb
#ItTakesAVillage
#VayCayInVenuzuela
#SanQuentinOrSingSing
#FileFolderGate2DigitalFileGate
#WhitewaterOnSteroids
#ShouldaStuckWithCattleFuturesUwench
#SirEdmundHillaryWouldBeSoProud
My favorite:
#Justice4Juanita
Wikileaks tweeted yesterday that “Phase Three of US Election Coverage would begin this week.”
Those were printed emails.
These are emails on a computer (or other electronic device.) These can be sorted and filtered and they can access meta-data. It will be much easier to target the search.
Exactly. What would be the max crime for sending classified e-mail? A slap on the wrist like Petraus got? The former governor of VA got sentenced to real jail time for accepting “gifts” as governor. Bribery is the far more serious crime.
I agree. I believe these are unedited versions in her “Life Insurance” file.
I'm finding that most, even after all of the news stories, don't.
Crooked Comey: Wait. Almost done. A couple more. There. All clear!! You can vote for Hillary now.
Sorting be “to” and “from” doesn’t work when people use aliases (reference Obama), have alternate accounts, multiple accounts, abandoned email accounts.
The point being, due diligence would dictate anything that can’t be culled as spam => must be read.
Due diligence would dictate a review by two separate reviewers before any one email is excluded. To avoid bias or simple error.
As two separate emails chains may be complimentary, correlations in time need to be made between separate emails chains to see the big picture.
After all that an army of hand picked DoJ lawyers descend to start dismissing anything and everything found.
==> no way this happens before the election....unless, again, the fix is in.
In the event they come across something disqualifying, do they release it right away before a full search is completed? If the rumors about the whole Lolita thing are true, wouldn’t they recommend on that alone?
I don’t thin k the PD in NC have a copy. The crime was committed in NYC. They have control. Trust me NYPD hate Wiener and Clinton. They won’t roll.
But.. the paragraph markings — the ones Hillary said she thought were alphabetically sequential — may still be intact.
They should look for: “(C),” “(S),” and “(TS).”
They can also search for FOB (friend of Bill), donor, donation, delete, destroy, and any and all classified markings by keyword search. This is not as difficult as they make it sound.
All they have to find are a few classified emails that were on the computer - that’s a crime. It is a safe bet that they are there and eventually may show that her attorney’s in fact did delete classified emails. Oops.
Find relevant emails from Hillary that she did not turn over to the State Department or that FBI could not find - that’s a crime. This would also implicate her attorney’s in the destruction of public records. Oops.
Everything else (there will be more) is gravy. The correct answer for the FBI since everyone is demanding that they say something now is - “we found classified emails and work related emails that were not turned over. The investigation will continue.”
That would be the end of the story prior to the election because (as someone kindly posted above me) they would both be disqualified to hold any office in the government if they were found guilty of either. The investigation will continue and people will know assuming (as the talking heads say) we all have a right to know.
This avenue of attack on Comey and the FBI by the left and media will backfire. This is the fault of Hillary. Period. She set it up, she arrogantly deleted stuff, and they missed something. Lest we forget - many people have said that Huma does not have a security clearance and Weiner did not either. Classified emails in the possession of either is a crime. Hillary (or anyone else) forwarding her classified information would be a crime. Using math like a Federal prosecutor there would potentially be hundreds of felony counts to such an indictment.
If they found Hillary guilty of even one misdemeanor count of destroying a public record she is, by law, disqualified from office. This was the simple charge that Comey could have proceeded with previously. All they needed to do was find one email sent from State to her email on the State server that was not turned over.
I have no doubt that is being discussed by top DOJ staff
“Comey can’t destroy evidence this time. The NYPD has the original files”
I bet what they found was leaked to Rudy. He said it is bad.
I see what you did there. ;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.