HRC’s ads here on TV in Tampa all reflect this “for the children” message. Lying and cheating are values people want to instill? As I find myself telling my kids more and more with each passing day, beware the idiots and jerks out there. There are many.
Only if you want your daughter to be a lying murdering traitorous political whore.
10 Who can find a virtuous woman? for her price is far above rubies.
11 The heart of her husband doth safely trust in her, so that he shall have no need of spoil.
12 She will do him good and not evil all the days of her life.
Many people consider the Kardashians, Beyoncé, or other celebrities as suitable “role models” for their daughters, so why not Hillary Clinton?
From the time Hillary got dismissed from the Watergate Special Prosecutor's office to the current mess with the private email server and the Clinton Foundation, we now know she is a power-hungry woman that will do anything to advance herself to the detriment of others--possibly including (dare I say it)--murder.
(/s)
Hillary as a role model for my sisters? Only if I want them to be Criminals... :-). No role models for my sisters would be our mom, our aunts, my dad’s mom...Not Hillary!! Hill, No!!
He had me until the last few paragraphs. Prager threw an otherwise intelligent piece right out the window by pushing the line of a woman’s place is in the home. Though I know that his intent was a much deeper meaning of what is seen (by his target audience for this piece) as an “antiquated” idea and I would never underestimate the importance of the woman’s role in the family unit, but the left just rolled their collective eyes when they got to his conclusion and the message was lost on those whom Prager targets.
Hey, I am all for strong women. Strong women in the home as well as in the professional world. And strong professional women can serve as fantastic role models for young gals... heck, or guys for that matter, looking for guidance and a path into the professional world. Where Hillary fails is that she put morals and ethics aside to achieve her goals. She used her husband and not only allowed him to use and abuse her, but attacked the female victims of her sexual predator husband in the purely selfish interest of wealth, power and fame. She sacrificed self-respect and all credibility and is now one of the most criminally corrupt politicians in this country’s history and she sold out the security of the United States for cold, hard cash.
Ma Barker was a strong woman as well. And in my opinion that is the point Dennis should have wrapped up his argument with. There is no gender bias when it comes to criminals and corruption. Hillary is not a role model, plain and simple. Hillary is a crook.
I have an older co-worker who was big for Bernie, fell in line with Hillary, and chortles daily at what the MSN or facebook pages have to say is the latest “Trump(ed)” news.
I went in to early vote yesterday and asked him if he’d voted yet (he lives in a different county). He said he never got registered.
Even his motivation for “Bern-ing” didn’t get him to the polls in the spring, let alone the fall.
The negativity online and in polls may not measure up much on election day.
If Hillary is elected in 2016, it will expose the emptiness of the phony “outrage” about a “culture of corruption that rises to the top ranks of the GOP” in 2006. It will expose the emptiness of Obama’s promise of “transparency”, of Pelosi’s pledge to be the “most ethical” administration ever.
Every Democrat owes Richard M. Nixon an apology for the Watergate hearings, they were (as Obama supporters like to say) an attempt to overturn the re-election of a twice popularly elected president.
If my fellow NYers had refused to let her carpetbag in NY state, we’d never have gotten here. And now they’re poised to vote for her for president. You can never underestimate the provincial mindset of New Yorkers. Very sad.
All three of mine, grown adults, are voting for Trump.