Posted on 11/02/2016 7:15:43 AM PDT by meopen
With his upturned chin, Mussolini reminds me of Obama.
I am not surprised that this is a fascist slogan.
I AM surprised that no one dug this up a year or more ago.
With the Clintons, you have to check EVERYTHING they say or do. If they fart, it needs to be analyzed.
They both caused death and destruction in Libya.
No bro is an island.
What does Hillary’s slogan mean, “Stronger Together” ? Who is she referring to? Thats similar to the anti-Brexit slogan, Better Together.?
Below is the recommendation and reference answer for question “What does Hillary’s slogan mean, “Stronger Together” ? Who is she referring to? Thats similar to the anti-Brexit slogan, Better Together.?” It was collected and sorted by the editor of this site but not sure the answer is entirely accurate.
Stronger Together from the votes but not as President.
Your suspicions are correct.
By “together” Hillary is referring to 1%’er globalists.
It’s a credo of fascism. “Fascism” men’s a bundle of sticks. Fascists like Mussolini & the ancient Romans believed that individualism makes nations weak, and collectivism makes a nation strong, individual sticks are easily broken but if you fasten them together, they become a strong bundle. So fascists would force people into a collectivist dictatorship.
Fascists use violence to achieve their ends, much like modern liberals. Fascists hate religion, they hate individualism, they hate the concept of absolute morality, they hate free speech, free thought & any kind of individual rights, they hate the Rule of Law & they believe the state should control the people, just like modern liberals.
The Illuminati are trying to create a global fascist dictatorship, they’re trying to force all the nation states to submit to the New World Order. Puppets like Hillary Clinton are able to be more open about these insidious ambitions now because the elite have so many people dumbed down & brainwashed.
The Lincoln Memorial has Lincoln resting his hands on fasces.
The style of Hillary’s overcoats has been described as “Contemporary Oven Mitt.”
Spread the word Brother.
The Romans appropriated the fasces from the Etruscan kings, the fascists, (whose very name is adopted from the fasces), appropriated the fasces from the from the Romans.
Mussolini, embraced the fasces as a symbol because of it’s meaning of “stronger together”. Using it on uniforms and buildings etc.
” One of the most recurrent symbols in these buildings was the fasces, the ancient symbol of Roman power that gives Fascism its name. The fasces were a collection of bound rods that were STRONGER TOGETHER than apart”
“Flag of the National Fascist Party, bearing the fasces, which was the premier symbol of Italian Fascism. A perched eagle clutching a fasces was a common symbol used on Italian Fascist uniforms. The original symbol of fascism, in Italy under Benito Mussolini, was the fasces.”
Having posted all that .... The phrase “stronger together” is only tangentially (best I can find) connected to Mussolini.
The fasces is used by many countries, including the United States.
“stronger together” can and does stand for good. To be “united”. A common force for GOOD. A Trump movement.
Attacking Hillary over the use of this phrase because it is tangentially connected to Fascists and Mussolini is wrongheaded and would backfire BIGLY!
Just look at this Google IMAGE search for fasces united states, I was amazed! Hardly just a Fascist symbol.
Il Duce and Ill Douche have a lot in common...
Good and a scary find! More on E Pluribus Unum and Illiarily~
Clinton Replaces ‘In God We Trust’ With ‘E Pluribus Unum’
July 29, 2016 by Michael Stone Leave a Comment
Religious conservatives are not happy.
In her historic acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention Thursday night, Hillary Clinton said:
America is once again at a moment of reckoning. Powerful forces are threatening to pull us apart. Bonds of trust and respect are fraying.
And just as with our founders, there are no guarantees. It truly is up to us. We have to decide whether we all will work together so we all can rise together.
Our country’s motto is ‘E Pluribus Unum’: out of many, we are one. Will we stay true to that motto?
Many religious conservatives were outraged by Clinton’s remarks. They were offended that Clinton had referred to “E Pluribus Unum” as our national motto, instead of “In God We Trust.”
In fact, religious conservatives have a point. “E Pluribus Unum” is not the official motto, the official motto is “In God We Trust.” But it wasn’t always that way.
“E Pluribus Unum” was considered the de facto motto of the United States until 1956 when the United States Congress passed an act (H. J. Resolution 396), adopting “In God We Trust” as the official motto.
The change to “In God We Trust” was motivated by fear of the Soviet Union and “godless communism” during the height of the Cold War and the “red scare” of the 1950’s. The change was a mistake that violated the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and betrayed the secular values upon which the U.S. was founded, as well as the explicit intentions of the founding fathers.
In fact, “E Pluribus Unum” was the original motto proposed and established by founding fathers John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Jefferson in 1776.
Writing for the conservative website RedState, Matthew Clark complains about Hillary’s use of “E Pluribus Unum,” and her omission of “In God We Trust,” at one point noting:
angry atheists have long tried to strip our National Motto and remove its meaning.
While Clinton is no atheist, her use of “E Pluribus Unum” in her acceptance speech was a refreshing and welcome touch. Also worth noting, in 2010 President Obama similarly said:
In the United States, our motto is E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one.
At that time some angry members of congress asked Obama to issue a public correction for saying the country’s motto was “E Pluribus Unum” instead of “In God We Trust.” Obama refused.
Currently there is an effort to have the national motto changed to “E Pluribus Unum.” For more on that effort see: The Original Motto Project.
Bottom line: Clinton’s use of the original, strictly secular national motto, was a refreshing note, and a much needed, if only symbolic, call to unity. “In God We Trust” is divisive and discriminatory; it does not belong on the nation’s currency, and should not be the national motto. Instead, the national motto should be returned to “E Pluribus Unum” out of respect for historical precedent, the founding fathers, and the secular values upon which this nation was founded.
Watch Clinton’s acceptance speech below (“E Pluribus Unum” comment begins around the 9:15 mark):
I spent some time last night on the Hillary Twitter thread.
I will say it again, her supporters would Vote for her if she were Comatose and being fed through an IV full of pureed Golden Retriever Puppies and leftover Baby Parts from Planned Parenthood.
Nothing would be more deserving.
WMAL Ping List!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.