It’s a snake pit.
Poor Andrea... Even her favourite political couple doesn’t keep their most vocal cheerleader a heads up on important stories. Disappointing, but I’m sure she was next on the list of people to give a ‘heads up to’... Likely right after Anthony Weiner.
Maybe it’s me — and I know the emails have inherent context on the day that they are sent, but I read these things and I am stunned by how unclear they are.
First: If the communication is on government computers, and could be subpoened, you might want to be vague to introduce some deniability. I get that. But, if you set up a private server, so that your communications will remain secret, then the vagueness seems less required.
Anyway, Mitchell was looking for response? From whom? And about what? Netanyahu? Hillary?
I grant that the people sending and receiving these emails probably understood what was being said MOST of the time. But I’ve seen enough business email to understand how easy it is for confusion to kick in. I’m pretty sure the top levels of government were regularly going off in the wrong direction because of emails that were just badly written by self-important fools who assumed that “everyone knows what I mean”.
Must be tough when a puppet doesn’t get her talking points before the hit.
Pray America wakes
The significance is how closely Andrea Mitchell is tied into the Clinton campaign. But this is widely accepted already by most conservatives who follow her reporting closely.
Democrats probably are oblivious to her bias because they see it as simply reporting good facts about Hillary or bad facts against Trump.
Well Neera, you should have just told that wrinkled up fossil to STFU!