Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Durus

His questioning is why I would like him at another position. At one time he did not want to serve all that long in the House. So I say, Rudy for AG and Trey for Solicitor General. Let’s put the pegs in the right holes for the talents displayed.


99 posted on 11/12/2016 7:07:39 AM PST by KC Burke (Consider all of my posts as first drafts. (Apologies to L. Niven))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Fennie

My first choice has always been Giuliani, but as mentioned he is getting a bit long in the tooth and seems to be searching for words, losing his edge.

I’ve also always had Gowdy as second choice. As already mentioned, he is not currently a prosecutor, just an investigator. Many have dragged out this idea that he got nothing done, but he has been stonewalled non stop by this corrupt administration. Hillary is a perfect example, she failed to turn over documentation requested until a subpoena had to be issued, then she deleted 33,000 emails and wiped the server, after the subpoena.

That’s been the case with just about everything Gowdy and Chaffetz have tried to do, nonstop stonewalling.

Gowdy has an excellent record as a prosecutor, is sharp as a tack, not old enough we’d have to worry about him losing his edge or dropping dead next month...

I’d go for Gowdy in a New York Minute, as the saying goes, I don’t think we’d be disappointed. and do you really think he’s not chomping at the bit to get his hands on an indictment after all he knows Hillary has done, and all the stonewalling she pulled off? He would do just as good a job as Rudy would, I’d take either of them.


104 posted on 11/12/2016 7:20:28 AM PST by Paleo Pete (President Trump. I can live with that...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson