Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/16/2016 11:26:27 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway

Ash Carter is a queer. He needs to be replaced ASAP and with a straight MAN, baby!!


2 posted on 11/16/2016 11:30:04 AM PST by MagUSNRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Turn the role of women in the military back to what it was in 1960 period.


4 posted on 11/16/2016 11:34:44 AM PST by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else need s said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

“Last year, after a series of intensive studies that took years to complete...”

That is not what happened. Obama ordered it and intimidated the Generals and Admirals into accepting it. The ‘studies’ were a white-wash.


5 posted on 11/16/2016 11:36:01 AM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Women play a vital role in the Armed Forces...and I'm not just talking doctors and nurses.But the only ones who should ever get near combat *are* doctors and nurses.
6 posted on 11/16/2016 11:36:02 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Deplorables' Lives Matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

They don’t perform the same physical fitness tests. If a woman wants to be in an infantry unit, she needs to be able to perform and pass the exact same physical requirements that a male would have to.

I’m also waiting to see a woman dead lift a 200lb man with an additional 40-60 lbs of gear and fireman carry them 100 yards with no assistance.


8 posted on 11/16/2016 11:38:02 AM PST by PJBankard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Some estimates say that if all combat jobs were closed to women, it would mean there were approximately 300,000 fewer jobs for women in the military.

Are we running a military or a Federal jobs program?

9 posted on 11/16/2016 11:38:47 AM PST by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Hampton says she thinks keeping all jobs open for women is a motivating factor, and she has enjoyed the competitive nature of being a Marine.

Its all about my feels...

10 posted on 11/16/2016 11:39:39 AM PST by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
'Last year, after a series of intensive studies that took years to complete,
Defense Secretary Ash Carter ordered the military to open all combat
jobs to woman'


Bullcrap...The Marines study said that integrated units preformed much
worse than all male units in achieving training objectives. Carter ignored
the report, attacked the Corps and went ahead with his leftist agenda.
11 posted on 11/16/2016 11:45:11 AM PST by major_gaff (University of Parris Island, Class of '84)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Some estimates say that if all combat jobs were closed to women, it would mean there were approximately 300,000 fewer jobs for women in the military.

Playing with numbers again. There are NOT 300,000 women who are willing to fill these combat positions.

13 posted on 11/16/2016 11:46:55 AM PST by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

For countless reasons, women in combat is one of the greatest follies of the obama years - years that were magnificent for their follies and fiascos.

Unlike say-to-day activity, in which idiotic social experiemnts can be tried by the ill-informed and misguided, the military keeps us all alive.

Weaken that and our fine troopers will die, and eventually we’ll all die.


16 posted on 11/16/2016 11:48:38 AM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

The number of women who would qualify would be so few that it would be an impediment to a military unit 2 half to observe gender differences in combat situations.

That would be an unnecessary difficulty to place upon the unit just for an occasional female who might be able to meet the standards


19 posted on 11/16/2016 12:45:56 PM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
"I don't think that they should withhold the opportunity"

An opportunity. As if the organized murder of combat is just a "job opportunity"! What kind of sick mind dreams up this stuff? Women have no place whatsoever in or around combat. They don't have the stamina, the testosterone/murderous capabilities, and the combatants sure as heck don't need the distraction women would provide.

No.

20 posted on 11/16/2016 12:46:44 PM PST by Chainmail (A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
It was insanity to open combat to women. May God guide Trump to reverse this absurd policy.

I remember he said he would consult with military brass, behind closed doors, to see what they recommend. I also recall that Pence was very against opening combat roles to women. I think there is a good chance that we will see a return to sanity on this issue.

23 posted on 11/16/2016 1:18:04 PM PST by Wyrd bið ful aræd (Flag burners can go screw -- I'm mighty PROUD of that ragged old flag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Here’s a combat role for ya- Combating mold and mildew in the bathtub and shower.


24 posted on 11/16/2016 1:26:29 PM PST by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Good news, and much needed. All leftist social experimentation in the US military needs to end on 1/20/2017.

1. Reinstitute DADT: no open homosexuality in the military

2. Absolutely no transgenders: immediate removal of such with dishonorable discharge

3. Disband DACOWITS

3. No women in ground combat roles

4. No women in submarine service

5. Eliminate all programs related to 'climate change'

28 posted on 11/16/2016 2:17:25 PM PST by bassmaner (Hey commies: I am a' white male, and I am guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

As far as this goes, President Trump’s rules for the military should be succinct: “Recruitment, retention and application are based exclusively on mission accomplishment. No other factors matter. Accomplish the mission and you continue to do it your way. Fail to accomplish the mission and you will be replaced.”


29 posted on 11/16/2016 2:24:39 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Friday, January 20, 2017. Reparations end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

“I think that if a woman and serve in combat and keep up with all the men that they should be able to”

No, they should be making a home for their husbands and children. That’s what women do. That’s what women are supposed to do.


30 posted on 11/16/2016 2:44:17 PM PST by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jet Jaguar

Ping.


31 posted on 11/16/2016 2:47:55 PM PST by TADSLOS (God Bless President-Elect Trump! God Bless the United States of America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway; markomalley; DYngbld; TADSLOS; xsrdx; big'ol_freeper; Mark17; mikefive; JDoutrider; ..

Active Duty ping.


44 posted on 11/16/2016 5:51:19 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson