Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: usconservative
Stein isn’t concerned about vote fraud, she’s a closet HRC supporter. This is about trying to keep Trump out of the White House. Anyone with an IQ above 72 can see that.

Stein is, of course, covering for Hillary. And the effort is more than likely funded by Soros. And it is aimed at Trump, to be sure.

But to what end, exactly?

It's inconceivable that a recount will turn up (or disqualify) enough votes to reverse the result in all three states. And, even if it did, we would then be engaged in a constitutional crisis of unprecedented magnitude with an uncertain outcome. It would not necessarily redound to Hillary's favor.

So, what is the game...really?

Could it be that the'Rats intentions are more modest...and insidious? Are they instead intent on simply delegitimatizing the Trump administration and sowing doubt about our constitutional system? Instead of an attempted coup d'etat, is this designed to weaken the national fabric in advance of a future coup d'etat?

31 posted on 11/25/2016 1:25:59 PM PST by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: okie01
The Clinton team knows what's going on. Whether or not they are in on it is not clear. From this site: http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/11/activists-urge-hillary-clinton-to-challenge-election-results.html

"A group of prominent computer scientists and election lawyers is reportedly urging Hillary Clinton to seek vote recounts in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan, arguing they have evidence that the results in those states were hacked or manipulated.

New York Magazine reports that the group includes voting-rights attorney John Bonifaz and J. Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society.

The magazine, quoting an unidentified source, said the experts held a conference call with Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta and campaign general counsel Marc Elias to make their case last Thursday.

Members of the group did not go public until Friday, when Halderman posted a blog item criticizing aspects of the New York article and making a case for checking ballots to ensure hacking did not occur.

As to whether a cyberattack changed the results of this year's election, Halderman says, "probably not."

38 posted on 11/25/2016 1:32:21 PM PST by randita (PLEASE STOP ALL THE WORTHLESS VANITIES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: okie01

“Piven-Clowad Strategy”. Overwhelm or de-legitimize every aspect of our government and society to make it collapse. Then make Socialism seem like the only real new beginning.


62 posted on 11/25/2016 2:46:55 PM PST by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: okie01
The endgame, as evidence by the forced hand recount maneuver, is to stall enough so that the recounts are not done in time.

So then what happens on Dec 13th? Anyone know?

87 posted on 11/26/2016 6:41:50 AM PST by MarMema (thank you President elect Trump for all you have done!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson