Skip to comments.
Stunning new data indicates El Nino drove record highs in global (NON AGW? WHAT?)
dailymail.co.uk ^
| 11/27/2016
| David Rose
Posted on 11/29/2016 5:22:28 AM PST by rktman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Hmmmm. I wonder if the upper case 'NASA' sats had been used would the results have been the same? Those brits huh? Not to worry wankers. According to reports, Nasa will not be doing as much climate investigating anymore. Will charlie (helloooo muslims) bolden be stepping down or replaced? Stay tuned.
1
posted on
11/29/2016 5:22:28 AM PST
by
rktman
To: rktman
Didn’t they say this was the “Warmest Year EVER®” recently?
Yeesh.
2
posted on
11/29/2016 5:24:15 AM PST
by
Darksheare
(Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
To: rktman
This is just crazy. Was there a vote of scientists taken that supports this view? How can we trust the evidence without a vote of consensus?
3
posted on
11/29/2016 5:24:57 AM PST
by
Sgt_Schultze
(If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
To: Darksheare
Give me a break will ya. There’s still 32 days left in the year to make it up. ;-)
4
posted on
11/29/2016 5:25:54 AM PST
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
To: rktman
Records highs never happened it was manipulated data
To: rktman
6
posted on
11/29/2016 5:27:04 AM PST
by
aomagrat
(Gun owners who vote for democrats are too stupid to own guns.)
To: rktman
7
posted on
11/29/2016 5:27:11 AM PST
by
Darksheare
(Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
To: Sgt_Schultze
Well, if they do a head count of those that receive funding to study why man has caused all this warming, the consensus would be around 100% of those ‘surveyed’. Anti warmers need not apply.
8
posted on
11/29/2016 5:28:14 AM PST
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
To: rktman
The El Niño that just passed was the single LONGEST El Niño,
as well as the second strongest on record(since 1950). It was 46% longer than the 1997-98 El Niño.
Long story why that detail never made the news; the anomaly measured against a ‘30 year base period’ that is updated every 5 years and the new base period 1986-2015 was only updated earlier this year. Everyone was likely focused on the current El Niño and didn’t notice the change of the historical significance.
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/ensostuff/ensoyears.shtml
There are older temp records however few records during the late 1930’s and 1940’s because of WWII
9
posted on
11/29/2016 5:39:53 AM PST
by
Bulwinkle
(Alec, a.k.a. Daffy Duck)
To: rktman
Very interesting thanks for posting.
To: rktman
First GlowBull cooling, then GlowBull warming, then Climate change. Seems we've gone full circle. I'll send a message to the left - you can go back to GlowBull cooling again.
11
posted on
11/29/2016 5:51:47 AM PST
by
C210N
To: Sgt_Schultze
“Was there a vote of scientists taken that supports this view? How can we trust the evidence without a vote of consensus?”
Can you say “loss of Federal grant money for climate research under Donald Trump?” If there is consensus, there is no need to continue funding. Throw that out there and watch the left go apoplectic.
12
posted on
11/29/2016 5:52:04 AM PST
by
EQAndyBuzz
(Election 2016 - Best election ever.)
To: EQAndyBuzz
Heads a poppin’ no doubt. When you mess with peoples money, watch out. More attention needs to be paid to Dr. Evil.
13
posted on
11/29/2016 5:57:15 AM PST
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
To: rktman
Bastardi and others are predicting a colder than usual December.
14
posted on
11/29/2016 6:00:58 AM PST
by
randita
(PLEASE STOP ALL THE WORTHLESS VANITIES!)
To: rktman
There’s no such thing as globull warming any longer. It’s “climate change”. So cooler than average temps will be blamed on humans as well.
They’ll figure out some way to continue the attack on fossil fuels.
15
posted on
11/29/2016 6:04:20 AM PST
by
randita
(PLEASE STOP ALL THE WORTHLESS VANITIES!)
To: randita
22 deg at my house currently.
16
posted on
11/29/2016 6:08:33 AM PST
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
To: rktman
Yeah, but they’ll say that El Niño is being driven by global warming. Or the lack of an El Niño is global warming. Or La Niña is global warming ...
17
posted on
11/29/2016 6:10:33 AM PST
by
Tanniker Smith
(Rome didn't fall in a day, either.)
To: C210N
Not disputing the chart, but have they been observing sunspots that long, or is this something that they’ve measured through other effects?
18
posted on
11/29/2016 6:12:38 AM PST
by
Tanniker Smith
(Rome didn't fall in a day, either.)
To: Tanniker Smith
Yes, sunspots *have* been observed in detail that long. Although methods have improved, there is some degree of allowances for ensuring numbers today match numbers from way back in the apples-to-apples sense - there are different number systems, to make this work.
And, yes, there are other effects. Like thermometer readings from way back and frozen Thames river events.
19
posted on
11/29/2016 6:18:23 AM PST
by
C210N
To: C210N
Back in the 1920’s early 30’s my dad and grandad used cut ice out of the Hudson River around the Athens NY area for ‘refrigeration’ needs. Does it even freeze solid these days? Must be glow bull climate discombobulation.
20
posted on
11/29/2016 6:21:40 AM PST
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson