Her professional name is Lillian Faifax.
Posted on 11/30/2016 7:50:54 PM PST by SeekAndFind
WOW! She’s been taking “lying lessons” from the ClinToons! She needs a lot more practice however.
Her professional name is Lillian Faifax.
Right. the strings on his fingers and Clinton’s elbows are just for decoration.
What is the latest. I hear 2/3 of WI counties will do a hand recount after reading that there would not be a hand recount. Why are these states bending over and getting reamed by these people and not standing up to them? Next I imagine the PA court will order a recount.
Jill Stein: Billionaire Soros Has Nothing to Do With Recount
BS
jill is full-on Coo-Coo.
“Voters deserve the assurance we can be confident in the vote. We are doing this to help voters restore their confidence in the vote”
What about voters who are confident in the voting in MI, WI and PA but not confident in CA, NV, VA and CO?
Stein is a liar.
And why return money from Soros? His ideas are the same as Stein’s.
Stein is a liar.
What a pile of BS. Soros doesn’t directly give to anything. His front political organizations (which are many) give the money and keep his name out of it. It’s still his money though.
Democrats think everyone is as stupid as they are that’s why smarter people are always on to their schemes.
If John and Mary Smith have 140,000 children, then I can see why they would want free health care.
My guess was that is was one or more Clinton Foundation donors taking one last shot before their investment goes down the drain. Maybe some Gulf State prince.
And why does Stein claim to uphold the principles of democracy and of our constitutional republic, when her true beliefs are those perpetrated by the Castro regime?
As Jill let slip in the emotion of the moment, “presente” is what embodies her values. You let yourself show a little bit there, Jill. Momentary loss of control just because Fidel kicked the bucket.
Why would Campaign Finance Laws pertain to a recount?
Yes, and Left feet never have five toes.
I am pretty sure it would not be hard to find out the truth.
The fact she earned so much more than she did for her presidential run, in record time, sure, that isn’t suspicious.
I am sure experts could find out exactly how she got this money and from where.
You have to ask yourself, why does Jill run...
She’s having contests recounted that only serve Clinton’s purposes. Either Clinton was in on it, or a supporter of Clinton was in on it.
What supporter of Clinton is going to jump on this with both feet? They know it’s a lost cause.
Soros doesn’t mind lost causes. His goal is always Chaos. He stirs things up. Get the recount going and yank the idiot snow-flakes back out on the streets.
IMO, Soros is the only guy that would push this with his pocket change.
Could be wrong, but if it walks like a Soros, sounds like a Soros, and stinks like a Soros, there’s a pretty good chance it’s a Soros.
It’s either Soros or the Clinton Foundation.....or both.
Stein is an agent for Clinton. The solid certain evidence has been put before here and she has chosen to ignore it.
The evidence is simply in the states she has chosen to recount. All of them are states lost by Clinton that were expected to win. There are states that Trump lost by far fewer voters and Stein did not pick even one. That is solid proof she is not doing this for ‘election integrity’.
Here are the top ten states lost by the least number of voters; look at the small number of winning votes in NH, ME, NV, then look at MN. No way she is doing this for anyone but Clinton.
1. Michigan 0.3 percent
Trump 47.6 percent, Clinton 47.3 percent
Difference: 13,080 votes
2. New Hampshire 0.4 percent
Clinton 47.6 percent, Trump 47.2 percent
Difference: 2,701 votes
3. Wisconsin 1 percent
Trump 47.9 percent, Clinton 46.9 percent
Difference: 27,257 votes
4. Pennsylvania 1.2 percent
Trump 48.8 percent, Clinton 47.6 percent
Difference: 68,236 votes (99 percent reporting)
5. Florida 1.2 percent
Trump 49 percent, Clinton 47.8 percent
Difference: 114,455 votes
6. Minnesota 1.5 percent
Clinton 46.4 percent, Trump 44.9 percent
Difference: 44,470 votes
7. Nevada 2.4 percent
Clinton 47.9 percent, Trump 45.5 percent
Difference: 26,434 votes
8. Maine 2.7 percent
Clinton 47.9 percent, Trump 45.2 percent
Difference: 19,995 votes
9. North Carolina 3.8 percent
Trump 49.9 percent, Clinton 46.1 percent
Difference: 177,009 votes
10. Arizona 3.9 percent
Trump 49.3 percent, Clinton 45.4 percent
Difference: 91,682 votes
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.