Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bobsunshine
Huh? I feel like a pingpong ball. I just read on another thread that it was ruled the recount must continue and even expland.


14 posted on 12/06/2016 5:19:28 PM PST by Cinnamontea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cinnamontea

Link?


17 posted on 12/06/2016 5:20:48 PM PST by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Cinnamontea; bobsunshine; boycott
There are multiple courts issuing opinions. The Michigan Appeals Court rejected the recount. However the Federal appeals court upheld a federal judge's ruling that the recount must precede.

State, federal courts release dueling decisions in battle over Michigan presidential recount

They are saying this might end up at SCOTUS.

38 posted on 12/06/2016 5:34:35 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Cinnamontea
The recount continues pursuant to the Federal Order. However, Michigan's AG can now go to the Federal Judge and request that he dissolves his order since Michigan has determined that Stein is not an aggrieved party. That hearing should take place within the next couple of days. The Federal Judge should not have gotten involved in this.
45 posted on 12/06/2016 5:39:07 PM PST by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson