Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Enlightened1

This article is much the same information that I have posted on several threads. I’ll just add that Judge Napolitano stated that it was the NSA that leaked the info to Wiki Leaks. Hillary’s private server and lack of security resulted in classified info being obtained by enemies.

Undercover operatives were exposed and some did not escape alive. They did not want her to be President. Revenge and Self preservation are powerful motives.

Assange also discussed the death of Seth Rich. He waltzed around the question of whether that was one of his sources, merely indicating that Wiki Leaks was always interested in finding out information-can’t remember exactly how he phrased it.

I’ll just note once again that Jesse Jackson rushed out to tell Obama to pardon Hillary, so whatever was revealed, he knows it to be true, else he would have denied the charges. Therefore, the electors should vote for Trump instead of a criminal that even her supporters feel is guilty.

So the question I ask is shouldn’t the American public be informed of true information before the election? Don’t we always have an October surprise? Shouldn’t all candidates expect that any and all sins are likely to come out and be prepared to answer the charges?

Shouldn’t candidates quit sinning and just be honest with integrity? If they can’t do that, shouldn’t they at least use secure systems, and quit plotting dirty tricks in emails sent over insecure systems?

Finally, I’ll just note for the record that “Fake News” is always and has always been around. Super market tabloids have been for sale ever since I can remember. TV “news” has morphed into an even bigger form of tabloid journalism with the advent of Hard Copy and the 24 hr news channels. People just have to sort their way through it, and the internet is no different. Censorship is absolutely forbidden. If something is false, the purveyor can always be sued.

And let’s not forget that the real “Fake News” was a Government instituted program involving major “news” outlets such as the Washington Post with the implementation of the Mockingbird Operation. Of course the Government told us that this all went away - and they wouldn’t lie would they?

After more than 50 years of reading and listening to news, I don’t believe a thing they have to say without further research.

I had a history teacher that told us one time- The best way to be informed is from many sources-and know what their bias is. That is why I read stuff from all over the world and why I read articles and comments here.


37 posted on 12/12/2016 6:08:40 AM PST by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: greeneyes
And let’s not forget that the real “Fake News” was a Government instituted program involving major “news” outlets such as the Washington Post with the implementation of the Mockingbird Operation. Of course the Government told us that this all went away - and they wouldn’t lie would they?

After more than 50 years of reading and listening to news, I don’t believe a thing they have to say without further research.

I had a history teacher that told us one time- The best way to be informed is from many sources-and know what their bias is. That is why I read stuff from all over the world and why I read articles and comments here.

Amen to all that. Be especially circumspect if the report is based on "anonymous sources", particularly if those sources are linked to left wing groups of any kind.

39 posted on 12/12/2016 6:41:51 AM PST by randita (PLEASE STOP ALL THE WORTHLESS VANITIES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson