Posted on 01/06/2017 1:20:53 PM PST by SeekAndFind
Don’t read it via a news outlet. Read it for yourself first here: https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf
RE: DISCREDITING HILLARY CLINTON
Jack Kerwick of Townhall describes it nicely...
if the Putin government had hacked away at the DNC email, wouldnt a man who is supposed to be as big of a thug as everyone says Putin is want to exploit all of that information to blackmail Hillary Clinton and her party?
It would have made eminently good sense for a master conniver like Putin to help Clinton win so that he could exert control over the American presidency for the next four or eight years.
On the other hand, if, as Democrats like Obama assure us, the hacked emails were boring, then why would a heavy-hitter like Putin even waste his time with them? If they were so unremarkable, then how did they manage to undermine trust in the Democrats and tilt the election in favor of Trump?
The Democrats cant have it both ways here: If the DNC/Hillary emails were dull, then there wouldve been no point for the Russians, or anyone else, to have hacked them, for no one is going to care about dull emails. If, though, the Russians or anyone else went through the trouble of hacking and releasing these emails with an eye toward catapulting to victory a candidate who was the Underdog of all underdogs, and if this strategy worked, then the content of those emails must have been anything but boring.
What was “discovered” simply CONFIRMED what any well informed voter already knew about Hillary Clinton. With or without Russia’s attempt at “discrediting” her, her record is already a DISCREDIT to herself.
Trump is an advocate of U.S. power.
Hillary is a Howard Zinn / Saul Alinsky Progressive.
Putin has had free reign with little opposition from the U.S. during the Obama/Clinton/Kerry regime.
Why would Putin want Trump over Hillary?
The most blatant false flag since the Reichstag Fire.
What is clear is that the Rats want to discredit Trump’s very comfortable victory and allow the Globalists the chance to declare nuclear war on Russia.
Given how easy Trump won in the end , there was never any need for external agents to help out . Nor is our security so weak that some guy sitting in his moms basement in the Kremlin could breach it . This was an inside job .
thank you Mr. Putin
bs
It appears a clear signal that all hackers are free to have at it. Everything will be blamed on Russians.
So Putin made Trump electable. Maybe the DNC can get some pointers from the Russians on how to make a candidate more electable to a broader electret. I wonder if it caused Putin more to elect Trump than it cost the DNC to fail to elect Hillary. Exit question: are the Russians now the beat campaign IU g managera in all of the United States?
Suppose a family member is about to marry a person you suspect of being a cheat and a no good philanderer.
Somebody discovered evidence of this and informed you ... what should be the right thing to do? Not inform the family member, or tell him.her what you discovered (i.e., the truth )?
In the above illustration ...
Replace “family member” with the “American Voter”
“Somebody” with Russia (or Wikileaks)
and “person” with “Hillary Clinton” and you ought to get the idea.
There should be no doubt that the Russians (and several others) had the interest and the means to hack the DNC and Podesta emails (and many, many other high-value American government and corporate targets).
There should be little doubt that the Russians actually DID hack the DNC and Podesta emails.
There should be quite a bit of doubt that the Russians fed the content to Assange.
There should be a hell of a lot of doubt that the Russians wanted to swing the U.S. election in favor of Trump.
Still . no . evidence .
We have to assume that the Russians knew there was dirt to be gained and that millions would switch their vote to Trump. What a ridiculous premise.
They claim their proof is that they captured congratulatory emails
Lordy if that’s the best they’ve got we are all screwed
I have not read it yet. I assume if they had a smoking gun, it would have been emblazoned in every headline in the country.
Therefore, I assess, and I agree with myself completely, that this whole thing is BS.
I also assess that these people will be out of their jobs in two weeks. I would say 14 days, but someone would call me a neo-nazi.
Since no one expected Trump to actually win outside a few election insiders within the US, wouldn’t a better conclusion be that the Russians were seeking to weaken a future President Hillary Clinton?
Seems like a lot of hindsight among Democrats.
They mean Ass-u-me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.