Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nero Germanicus
Why would two birth certificates issued in the same month for children born in the same hospital have such strange similarities?

Maybe because they were for two children born in the same hospital in the same month? The could have been done on the same kind of typewriter with the same kind of stamps. Maybe with the exact same typewriter and stamp.

Why wouldn't they be similar? What is there in one birth certificate that would make you think it fake based wholly on the document itself?

It might be surprising to find two documents with the stamps at about the same angle, but if out of hundreds or thousands of birth certificates it would be surprising if two weren't stamped at about the same angle.

I'm not sure how much the angle would matter. They had to change the numbers. Why couldn't they change the angle? But if you look at the stamped dates on the left, the angle isn't exactly the same, if that matters.

If you look at both PDFs, you can see the letters penciled in by the coder who submitted data to the federal government. That's why a document that gave the father's race as "African" isn't necessarily a fake.

The birth certificate records the information the parents gave to the clerk -- "Caucasian" or "Hawn-Caucasian-Chinese" or "Hawn-Caucasian-Korean" or even African -- and then another clerk found the federal code these designations corresponded with (1 or 3 or 9), and passed the totals on to federal health authorities.

38 posted on 01/09/2017 3:07:04 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: x

If you didn’t look at the evidence in the videos, you have no business posting. You should have spent your time looking at the videos instead of writing seven paragraphs of crap.


69 posted on 01/09/2017 3:49:53 PM PST by zipper (In their heart of hearts, every Democrat is a communist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: x

The document anomalies wouldn’t matter as much if there were solid evidence that Obama’s mother was in HI in the mos preceding Obama’s birth and immediately afterward. Instead of evidence, however, Obama’s biographers have come up with a black hole in his mother’s history: a hole that covers the exact time frame of the pregnancy.

Why don’t you answer this question. Why would the mother of a newborn [supposing she actually was in HI] undertake a long, expensive, arduous, UNNECESSARY relocation? Put another way, why would Obama’s mother abandon her family/support group, her house, her school, and the balmy HI climate to undertake a long, expensive flight to the overcast, drizzly, soon-to-be snowy/icy climate of Seattle, with the additional expenses of renting an apartment, paying a babysitter, and only getting four measly extension classes to show for all the time, effort and money?

Be convincing in your explanation, and have some evidence to back it up.


76 posted on 01/09/2017 3:55:45 PM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: x
Maybe because they were for two children born in the same hospital in the same month? The could have been done on the same kind of typewriter with the same kind of stamps. Maybe with the exact same typewriter and stamp.

How some one who has been here as long as you have, can post such ignorant claptrap is beyond belief.

77 posted on 01/09/2017 3:56:27 PM PST by itsahoot (Three words I don't want to hear, Comprehensive Immigration Reform.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson