Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway

There was no constitutional violation with the cross, but they are now in violation of the free exercise clause.


2 posted on 01/14/2017 11:37:14 AM PST by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Robinson
That may depend on who puts the cross there.

During the Christmas season New York City -- a bastion of radical secularism -- had a beautiful Nativity scene set up right in Central Park. It met every legal standard under the free exercise clause because it was set up by a private organization (the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, I believe) with all of the required city permits.

12 posted on 01/14/2017 11:45:28 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

I agree with you.

First of all, it should be argued that this cross was merely a marker observing a historical fact.

That that fact happened to be that one of the first Western edifices in the region was religious in nature, should not matter.

Anti-Christian (and anti-U.S.) people should not be able to sanitize our history.

This is indeed a first amendment issue.

There’s no real church and state issue here.

This is a history and state issue.


26 posted on 01/14/2017 1:18:05 PM PST by DoughtyOne (John McStain. The friend of those who hate our nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Remove Santa from the city name too. They have already lost their souls.


27 posted on 01/14/2017 1:43:13 PM PST by keving (We get the government we vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson